Critical system in condensed matter physics

mimpim
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
My question is a little general, and that is how we say that a system is a critical system? for example the transverse Ising model is a critical system? I think the answer is yes, since as we change the transverse field we see that there is a phase transition between ferromagnet and paramagnet phases. Thanks for any comment.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are talking about a system that undergoes a quantum phase transition at a quantum critical point.

A quantum phase transition is defined as a phase transition at zero temperature by tuning some parameter (in the quantum ising model this is the transverse field). However although a QPT is defined as happening at T=0, it still has implications at nonzero temperature in the quantum critical region. This also exists in antiferromagnet transitions. In the cuprate superconductors when you look at a plot of T v doping, the area in between above the quantum critical point is called a strange metal.

You can actually only have an ordered state for the quantum ising model at T=0.
Look at the second edition of quantum phase transitions.
 
radium said:
I think you are talking about a system that undergoes a quantum phase transition at a quantum critical point.

A quantum phase transition is defined as a phase transition at zero temperature by tuning some parameter (in the quantum ising model this is the transverse field). However although a QPT is defined as happening at T=0, it still has implications at nonzero temperature in the quantum critical region. This also exists in antiferromagnet transitions. In the cuprate superconductors when you look at a plot of T v doping, the area in between above the quantum critical point is called a strange metal.

You can actually only have an ordered state for the quantum ising model at T=0.
Look at the second edition of quantum phase transitions.
Thanks for the reply. It gave me lots if useful information. By your answers, it raised some more question for me.
1) by this definition of a critical system that goes through a phase transition by changing a parameter, the transverse Ising model would be a critical system??

2) having an ordered phase is a must for having a phase transition?

Thanks again.
 
1. I wouldn't call these things critical systems, they are systems that undergo quantum phase transition at quantum critical points. The transverse ising model undergoes a quantum phase transition at J=h (it is self dual).

2. No, in topological phases of matter there is no symmetry breaking at the transition but the two states are distinct, by their topology. You can have a transition between a trivial insulator and a Z2 topological insulator just by tuning the spin orbit interaction to get band inversion. You don't break any symmetry going from one to the other but you do go from a topologically trivial system to a nontrivial system, and these two states cannot be smoothly connected.
 
radium said:
1. I wouldn't call these things critical systems, they are systems that undergo quantum phase transition at quantum critical points. The transverse ising model undergoes a quantum phase transition at J=h (it is self dual).

2. No, in topological phases of matter there is no symmetry breaking at the transition but the two states are distinct, by their topology. You can have a transition between a trivial insulator and a Z2 topological insulator just by tuning the spin orbit interaction to get band inversion. You don't break any symmetry going from one to the other but you do go from a topologically trivial system to a nontrivial system, and these two states cannot be smoothly connected.

Thanks again for the explanations. Although I do not know much about topological insulator, but your explanation for (2) was convincing to me. Now I have one more question:
In one dimension (1D) there is no phase transition (for example for the 1D hopping model in a lattice) and if you could calculate the correlation functions, you will get that much physics?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top