Depletion zone of a n-i junction

IRobot
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am interested in a junction between n doped and intrinsic GaAs, specifically the localization and width of the depletion zone (where the built-in E field is). In a p-n junction the depletion zone is calculated under the condition of electro-neutrality, if I see i-GaAs as really really low doped p-GaAs, can I consider that the depletion zone will be mostly in the i-GaAs? (I have in mind a juxtaposition of one layer of n-GaAs with a layer of i-GaAs which has twice the width of the first one)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a p-i-n structure, the depletion zone looks similar to that of a p-n but with the additional i region in the center. In photodiodes and RF switch devices, the i region width d is (I think) much larger than the widths of the depletion zones in the p and n layers, so the total depletion width will be a little larger than d.
 
Well, in my case there is no p-layer behind the i region, the piece is really engineered like that. Or at least it is presented like that in the article based on this device.
At the moment, I am really inclined to look at the i region as a p region feebly doped in comparison to the n one, and in this case I would have a depletion layer entering over the i-GaAs.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top