DG Connection: Estimating Voltage Rise at Point of Common Coupling (PCC)

In summary, the voltage rise due to injection of power in pcc can be estimated from the Thevenin equivalent representing the network "upstream" pcc. The Thevenin voltage can be taken as the nominal voltage in the pcc, and the Thevenin impedance is given by Z= V/√3⋅Isc (1).
  • #1
hnes
4
0
Hi!

According to the book "Renewable Energy on Power Systems" by Freris & Infield, the voltage rise due to injection of power in pcc can be estimated from the Thevenin equivalent representing the network "upstream" pcc (Figure 1). The Thevenin voltage can be taken as the nominal voltage in the pcc, and the Thevenin impedance
is given by Z= V/√3⋅Isc (1).
Capture.JPG

Figure 1: Thevenin equivalent

I've got some measured fault current values (three phase) for different Pcc's in different LV radial distribution networks, and want to make an estimate of the voltage rise in each Pcc based on the calculated source impedance in formula 1. This is pretty straight forward according to the mentioned literature, but there is something i don't get:

Is the fault current in the Pcc depending on the numbers of other buses in the LV radial? For me it seems pretty obvious that the impedance seen from the Pcc with DG is lower if your neighbor has a big demand of power, and thus the voltage rise in the Pcc will become smaller (?). I don't get how this Zth calculated from the Isc can be used if this is not the case.
PS: I probably lack some understanding in source impedance and fault levels.

<< Edit -- clarification of PCC definition >>

Point of Common Coupling - the point where the the generator is connected to the public grid.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
It depends where you are measuring the fault current.

Your equivalent diagram actually includes a mirror image to the right where the equivalent source impedance from the system is in series with the open circuit voltage from the system.

If you are measuring the fault current at the PCC, for example, for a single-phase-to-ground fault, the PCC sees the total fault current - from the DG as well as from the system.

If you are measuring the output of the DG (inverter), they you can use your simplified diagram since the system won't have a significant effect on the results.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #3
Hi!
Thanks for replying, magoo. I've been busy this weekend, sorry for the late response.

I have to make some clarifications, seems like my explanation was confusing:

The Thevenin equivalent is the network, Snet means produced power minus used power (net) from the DG (PV, wind, CHP, etc...). The fault current is measured in the Pcc, that's the interface between the grid operator and the consumer (and due to DG, manufacturer).

So my question still stands, but i can try to clarify it with a figure:
upload_2017-6-26_9-38-26.png
Is the fault current/level in the Pcc depending on the numbers of other buses in the LV radial (situation A vs. B) ? For me it seems pretty obvious that the total source impedance seen from the Pcc (in a thevenin equivalent) is smaller if your neighbor has a big demand of power (i.e. one or both neighbor buses in situation A have a big power demand), and thus the voltage rise in the Pcc will become smaller (?). Said in another way; How does the topology of the LV distribution network affect the source impedance? Bigger impedance seen from the Pcc = bigger voltage rise (formula 1, post 1) - but if your neighbor in some way uses all your PV-made power, should this impedance then be smaller?.
 

1. What is DG Connection and why is it important?

DG Connection refers to the connection of Distributed Generation (DG) systems to the main power grid. It is important because DG systems, such as solar panels and wind turbines, are becoming increasingly popular as a source of renewable energy and therefore need to be properly integrated into the grid to ensure reliable and safe operation.

2. What is Point of Common Coupling (PCC) and why is it significant?

The PCC is the location where the DG system is connected to the main grid. It is significant because it is the point where the voltage rise caused by the DG system can have the greatest impact on the grid and other connected devices. It is important to accurately estimate this voltage rise to ensure the stability and safety of the grid.

3. How is voltage rise at PCC estimated?

Voltage rise at PCC can be estimated using mathematical models and simulation tools, taking into account factors such as the size and type of DG system, its location in relation to the PCC, and the characteristics of the grid. These estimations can also be verified through field measurements.

4. What are the potential consequences of incorrect voltage rise estimation at PCC?

Incorrect estimation of voltage rise at PCC can lead to overloading of the grid, voltage fluctuations, and potential damage to connected devices. It can also cause stability issues and power quality problems, leading to power outages and disruptions in service.

5. How can voltage rise at PCC be mitigated?

Voltage rise at PCC can be mitigated through various methods, such as using voltage regulation devices, implementing power factor correction, and adjusting the settings of DG systems. Proper coordination and communication between DG owners, grid operators, and regulatory bodies is also crucial in mitigating voltage rise at PCC.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
963
Back
Top