Diagonalizability of Linear Transformation

In summary: Let $f:\,V\rightarrow V$ be a function and suppose that $f$ is not diagonalizable. Prove that there exists a root space $L$ such that $f$ is diagonalizable.
  • #1
Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
1,568
1
Hi everyone, :)

Here's a question I was stuck on. Hope you people can help me out. :)

Prove that \(f:\,V\rightarrow V\) over \(\mathbb{C}\) is diagonalizable iff all root vectors are eigenvectors.

The definition of root vectors is given >>here<<.

Now a \(n\times n\) matrix can be diagonalized if it has \(n\) distinct eigenvalues. So I don't see how the given condition (all root vectors are eigenvectors) can ensure that there are \(n\) distinct eigenvalues.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sudharaka said:
Hi everyone, :)

Here's a question I was stuck on. Hope you people can help me out. :)
The definition of root vectors is given >>here<<.

Now a \(n\times n\) matrix can be diagonalized if it has \(n\) distinct eigenvalues. So I don't see how the given condition (all root vectors are eigenvectors) can ensure that there are \(n\) distinct eigenvalues.

Hi Sudharaka!

The eigenvalues do not have to be distinct for a matrix to be diagonalizable.
(It is a sufficient condition though.)
Consider for instance the identity matrix. For instance in 2 dimensions:
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}
All its eigenvalues are 1 and it is a diagonal matrix.
It has a unique eigenspace of dimension 2 (edited).

The difference with a root space is for instance visible in:
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}
This matrix also has 1 as its eigenvalue, but the corresponding eigenspace is 1-dimensional, as opposed to the root space which is 2-dimensional.
They say that the eigenvalue 1 has geometric multiplicity 1 and algebraic multiplicity 2.
 
  • #3
Sudharaka said:
Hi everyone, :)

Here's a question I was stuck on. Hope you people can help me out. :)
The definition of root vectors is given >>here<<.

Now a \(n\times n\) matrix can be diagonalized if it has \(n\) distinct eigenvalues. So I don't see how the given condition (all root vectors are eigenvectors) can ensure that there are \(n\) distinct eigenvalues.
Hey Sudharaka!
I cannot preview the definition of 'root vectors' in the link you have provided. Can you write the definition out here?
 
  • #4
I like Serena said:
Hi Sudharaka!

The eigenvalues do not have to be distinct for a matrix to be diagonalizable.
(It is a sufficient condition though.)
Consider for instance the identity matrix. For instance in 2 dimensions:
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}
All its eigenvalues are 1 and it is a diagonal matrix.
It has a unique eigenspace of dimension 2 (edited).

The difference with a root space is for instance visible in:
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}
This matrix also has 1 as its eigenvalue, but the corresponding eigenspace is 1-dimensional, as opposed to the root space which is 2-dimensional.
They say that the eigenvalue 1 has geometric multiplicity 1 and algebraic multiplicity 2.

Thanks very much for the reply. :) So we cannot use the condition "a n×n matrix can be diagonalized if it has n distinct eigenvalues" since it's only a sufficient condition. Okay, I'll try think about a different approach. Back to square one. :p

caffeinemachine said:
Hey Sudharaka!
I cannot preview the definition of 'root vectors' in the link you have provided. Can you write the definition out here?

Hi caffeinemachine, :)

Thanks very much for the interest in answering my question. :)

It defines the root space, the set of all root vectors. Here's the definition,

Definition: The set \(S_i\) of all vectors \(x\in V\) defined by,

\[S_i=\{x\in V\,:\,(\lambda_i I_v-L)^{m_i}x=0\}\]

where \(i=1,2,\cdots ,k\).

\(m_i\) is the multiplicity of the eigenvalue \(\lambda_i\) in the minimum polynomial \(\psi(\lambda)\) of \(L\), is called the root space \(L\) associated with \(\lambda_i\). In particular, when \(m_i=1\), the root space \(S_i\) becomes the eigenspace \(E_i\) of \(L\) associated with the eigenvalue \(\lambda_i\).
 
  • #5
Sudharaka said:
Thanks very much for the reply. :) So we cannot use the condition "a n×n matrix can be diagonalized if it has n distinct eigenvalues" since it's only a sufficient condition. Okay, I'll try think about a different approach. Back to square one. :p
Hi caffeinemachine, :)

Thanks very much for the interest in answering my question. :)

It defines the root space, the set of all root vectors. Here's the definition,

Definition: The set \(S_i\) of all vectors \(x\in V\) defined by,

\[S_i=\{x\in V\,:\,(\lambda_i I_v-L)^{m_i}x=0\}\]

where \(i=1,2,\cdots ,k\).

\(m_i\) is the multiplicity of the eigenvalue \(\lambda_i\) in the minimum polynomial \(\psi(\lambda)\) of \(L\), is called the root space \(L\) associated with \(\lambda_i\). In particular, when \(m_i=1\), the root space \(S_i\) becomes the eigenspace \(E_i\) of \(L\) associated with the eigenvalue \(\lambda_i\).
Let $\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_k$ be all the distinct eigenvalues of an operator $L$ on a finite dimensional complex vector space $V$, with $\lambda_i$ having multiplicity (algebraic) equal to $m_i$.

Then, you may be already knowing that:

$V=\displaystyle \bigoplus_{i=1}^k\text{ null}(L-\lambda_iI)^{m_i}$.

Now if all the root vectors are eigenvectors, then, from the above equation it is easy to see that there is a basis of $V$ consisting only of eigenvectors of $L$. Thus $L$ is diagonalizable.

Try proving the other direction. :)
 
  • #6
caffeinemachine said:
Let $\lambda_1,\ldots,\lambda_k$ be all the distinct eigenvalues of an operator $L$ on a finite dimensional complex vector space $V$, with $\lambda_i$ having multiplicity (algebraic) equal to $m_i$.

Then, you may be already knowing that:

$V=\displaystyle \bigoplus_{i=1}^k\text{ null}(L-\lambda_iI)^{m_i}$.

Now if all the root vectors are eigenvectors, then, from the above equation it is easy to see that there is a basis of $V$ consisting only of eigenvectors of $L$. Thus $L$ is diagonalizable.

Try proving the other direction. :)

Thanks very much for the useful idea about solving this problem. May I also know about the book that you refer for Linear Algebra. :)
 
  • #7
Sudharaka said:
Thanks very much for the useful idea about solving this problem. May I also know about the book that you refer for Linear Algebra. :)
Thanks Sudharaka. I use Axler's Linear Algebra Done Right ​for linear algebra.
 
  • #8
Sudharaka said:
Prove that \(f:\,V\rightarrow V\) over \(\mathbb{C}\) is diagonalizable iff all root vectors are eigenvectors.

Not sure what you can use.
Here's another method.

Put f in Jordan Normal form.
The size of each Jordan block corresponds with the multiplicity of the corresponding root space.
If they are all 1, that means each Jordan block has size 1.
In other words, we have a diagonal matrix.
If they are not, we can't diagonalize it.
 

1. What is diagonalizability of linear transformation?

Diagonalizability of linear transformation refers to the process of finding a basis for a vector space where the matrix representation of the linear transformation is a diagonal matrix.

2. How do you determine if a linear transformation is diagonalizable?

To determine if a linear transformation is diagonalizable, you need to check if the linear transformation has a full set of linearly independent eigenvectors. If it does, then the linear transformation is diagonalizable.

3. What are the benefits of diagonalizability in linear transformation?

Diagonalizability allows for easier computation and analysis of linear transformations. It also simplifies the process of finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors, as well as making it easier to understand the behavior of the transformation.

4. Can any linear transformation be diagonalizable?

No, not all linear transformations are diagonalizable. Only linear transformations that have a full set of linearly independent eigenvectors can be diagonalizable.

5. How is diagonalizability related to eigenvalues and eigenvectors?

Diagonalizability is closely related to eigenvalues and eigenvectors. A linear transformation is diagonalizable if and only if it has a full set of linearly independent eigenvectors, which correspond to the diagonal entries of the diagonal matrix representation of the linear transformation.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
943
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
2
Replies
52
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
903
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top