A Differences between Actions in Curved Spacetime

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haorong Wu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacetime
Haorong Wu
Messages
417
Reaction score
90
TL;DR Summary
I have found two different actions of scalar field in curved spacetime. I am not sure their differences.
First, in Anastopoulos C, Hu B L. A master equation for gravitational decoherence: probing the textures of spacetime[J]. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2013, 30(16): 165007. , the Einstein-Hilbert action is used to analysis a quantum matter field interacting with the gravitational field, $$S=\frac 1 \kappa \int d^4 x \sqrt{-g} R + \int d^4 x \sqrt {-g} (-\frac 1 2 g^{\mu \nu} \nabla_{\mu} \phi \nabla_{\nu} \phi-\frac 1 2 m^2 \phi^2) .$$

Then, in Spacetime and geometry by Sean M. Carroll, section 9.4, the quantum field theory in curved spacetime consider the following Lagrange density $$L=\sqrt {-g} (-\frac 1 2 g^{\mu \nu} \nabla_{\mu} \phi \nabla_{\nu} \phi-\frac 1 2 m^2 \phi^2 -\xi R \phi^2) .$$

It appears that in the first paper, the curvature scalar ##R## does not couple to the scalar field, while the one in the second case does.

Are the two actions/Lagrangians describe different situations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haorong Wu said:
Summary:: I have found two different actions of scalar field in curved spacetime. I am not sure their differences.
S=\frac 1 \kappa \int d^4 x \sqrt{-g} R + \int d^4 x \sqrt {-g} (-\frac 1 2 g^{\mu \nu} \nabla_{\mu} \phi \nabla_{\nu} \phi-\frac 1 2 m^2 \phi^2) .L=\sqrt {-g} (-\frac 1 2 g^{\mu \nu} \nabla_{\mu} \phi \nabla_{\nu} \phi-\frac 1 2 m^2 \phi^2 -\xi R \phi^2).
In 4 dimensions and for m = 0, the first action is not conformal invariant while the second one is invariant for the specific value \xi = \frac{1}{6}. Also, the case \xi = 0 is called minimally coupled.
Are the two actions/Lagrangians describe different situations?
Yes they are, for you can convince yourself by deriving the equations of motions and the energy-momentum tensors from both actions.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top