Dimension of direct sum axler

In summary: As stated, you can't prove this, it isn't true. It is true and you can prove it if you add the condition that the only vector contained in both subspaces is the 0 vector. Of course, your proof will have to use that condition.
  • #1
jecharla
24
0
Exercise #17 in Linear Algebra done right is to prove that the dimension of the direct sum of subspaces of V is equal to the sum of the dimensions of the individual subspaces. I have been trying to figure this out for a few days now and I'm really stuck. Here's what I have got so far:

Choose a base of each of the subspaces and combine them in one list which clearly spans V and has the length we are looking for. Now we just have to show that this list is linearly independent.

If this list is not linearly independent than one of the vectors is in the span of the previous vectors. If I could show that this vector must be in the span of one of the other bases, then that would prove the result but I can't quite figure out how to get there. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
jecharla said:
Exercise #17 in Linear Algebra done right is to prove that the dimension of the direct sum of subspaces of V is equal to the sum of the dimensions of the individual subspaces. I have been trying to figure this out for a few days now and I'm really stuck. Here's what I have got so far:

Choose a base of each of the subspaces and combine them in one list which clearly spans V and has the length we are looking for. Now we just have to show that this list is linearly independent.

If this list is not linearly independent than one of the vectors is in the span of the previous vectors. If I could show that this vector must be in the span of one of the other bases, then that would prove the result but I can't quite figure out how to get there. Any help would be greatly appreciated.



Let's do it for two subspaces as this summarizes the logical argument: suppose [itex]A:=\{v_1,...,v_k\}\,\,,\,\,B:=\{w_1,...,w_r\}\,[/itex] are basis resp. of subspaces [itex]\,U,W\leq V\,\,,\,\,with\,\,\,U\cap W=\{0\}[/itex].

Suppose one of the vectors in [itex]\,\{v_1,...,v_k,w_1,...,w_r\}\,[/itex] depends linearly on the preceeding ones. Then this must be

one of the [itex]\,w_i\,[/itex]'s (why?) , so [tex]\,w_i\in Span\{v_1,...,v_k,w_1,...,w_{i-1}\}\,\Longrightarrow w_i=a_1v_1+...+a_kv_k+b_1w_1+...+b_{i-1}w_{i-1}[/tex] We then get [tex]a_1v_1+...+a_kv_k=-b_1w_1-...-b_{i-1}w_{i-1}+w_i\in V\cap W=\{0\}[/tex]

From here, [itex]\,a_1v_1+...+a_kv_k=0=-b_1w_1-...-b_{i-1}w_{i-1}+w_i\,[/itex] , from where we reach at once our contradiction.

DonAntonio
 
  • #3
jecharla said:
Exercise #17 in Linear Algebra done right is to prove that the dimension of the direct sum of subspaces of V is equal to the sum of the dimensions of the individual subspaces.
As stated, you can't prove this, it isn't true. It is true and you can prove it if you add the condition that the only vector contained in both subspaces is the 0 vector. Of course, your proof will have to use that condition.

I have been trying to figure this out for a few days now and I'm really stuck. Here's what I have got so far:

Choose a base of each of the subspaces and combine them in one list which clearly spans V and has the length we are looking for. Now we just have to show that this list is linearly independent.

If this list is not linearly independent than one of the vectors is in the span of the previous vectors. If I could show that this vector must be in the span of one of the other bases, then that would prove the result but I can't quite figure out how to get there. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
If they were not you could construct a non-zero vector that is in both subspaces.
 
  • #4
HallsofIvy said:
As stated, you can't prove this, it isn't true. It is true and you can prove it if you add the condition that the only vector contained in both subspaces is the 0 vector. Of course, your proof will have to use that condition.



This condition is implicit in the direct sum thing: cero must be the intersection of any space and the sum of all the others, otherwise the sum is not direct.

Donantonio

If they were not you could construct a non-zero vector that is in both subspaces.
 
  • #5


I can assure you that you are on the right track in your thought process. The key to proving this exercise is to show that the combined list of bases is linearly independent. To do this, you can use the fact that if a vector is in the span of the previous vectors, then it must be a linear combination of those vectors. This means that you can write the vector as a linear combination of the bases from the individual subspaces. Since the bases from each subspace are linearly independent, this linear combination must be unique. Therefore, if a vector is in the span of the previous vectors, it must be in the span of one of the individual subspaces.

Using this logic, you can show that any vector in the combined list can be written as a linear combination of the bases from the individual subspaces. This would prove that the combined list is linearly independent and therefore, the dimension of the direct sum is equal to the sum of the dimensions of the individual subspaces.

I hope this helps in your understanding of this exercise. Keep up the good work and don't hesitate to reach out for further clarification.
 

What is the dimension of a direct sum?

The dimension of a direct sum is equal to the sum of the dimensions of its individual components. In other words, if A and B are vector spaces, then the dimension of A ⊕ B is equal to the dimension of A plus the dimension of B.

How do you compute the dimension of a direct sum?

To compute the dimension of a direct sum, you can use the formula dim(A ⊕ B) = dim(A) + dim(B). This means that you simply add the dimensions of the individual components together to get the dimension of the direct sum.

What is the significance of the dimension of a direct sum?

The dimension of a direct sum is important because it tells us how many linearly independent vectors are needed to span the entire direct sum. This can be useful in solving systems of linear equations and understanding the structure of vector spaces.

Can the dimension of a direct sum be negative?

No, the dimension of a direct sum cannot be negative. The dimension of a vector space is always a non-negative integer, and since the dimension of a direct sum is the sum of dimensions, it must also be non-negative.

Is the dimension of a direct sum always equal to the sum of the dimensions of its components?

Yes, the dimension of a direct sum is always equal to the sum of the dimensions of its components. This is a fundamental property of direct sums and can be proven using basic properties of vector spaces.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
890
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
891
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
603
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top