MHB Divide Fractions: Is Subtraction of Exponents Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DawnC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractions
AI Thread Summary
When dividing exponential fractions with the same base, the correct operation is to subtract the exponents. For example, in the expression x^9/x^4, the calculation follows the rule a^b/a^c = a^(b-c), resulting in x^(9-4) = x^5. This can also be demonstrated by canceling the common base in the fraction. It is important to note that this subtraction of exponents applies only when the bases are identical. Therefore, the statement about subtracting exponents when dividing fractions is accurate in the context of exponential expressions.
DawnC
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
When you divide a fraction, you minus the exponent - correct?

Example: x^9/x^4 you take the 9-5 = 5 so it would be x^5 -correc?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, one of the rules of exponents is:

$$\frac{a^b}{a^c}=a^{b-c}$$

Thus, we find:

$$\frac{x^9}{x^4}=x^{9-4}=x^5$$

Another way to look at this is to write:

$$\frac{x^9}{x^4}=\frac{x^5\cdot x^4}{x^4}=\frac{x^5\cdot\cancel{x^4}}{\cancel{x^4}}=x^5$$

This relies on another rule of exponents:

$$a^b\cdot a^c=a^{b+c}$$
 
DawnC said:
When you divide a fraction, you minus the exponent - correct?

Divide a fraction? Dividing a fraction means something like this : $\displaystyle\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{c}$ .
What you want to say is : When you solve an exponential fraction, you subtract the exponents - correct?
Yes, correct, but only when the bases are same.
We subtract the exponent of the denominator from the exponent of the numerator.
$\displaystyle\frac{a^m}{a^n}=a^{m-n}$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top