- #1
DrTherapist
- 25
- 9
I think the concept of memorizing (at least in the pure sciences) is not correct at all. I think it requires pure logic and skills over anything else. Memorizing is just 1 percent of the deal. I am a BSc first year student and I got an A in Zoology-I despite not having a photographic memory. I got a B+ in Zoology-II, and remaining two botany papers. I guess I did pretty well, despite not having a good memory.
I talked with a few users on another forum (which wasn't about science, I know I know, I did a mistake) and they "could not understand" what I was saying. I guess either they faked their background in science or is it really true that science (let's say, life sciences for instance) relies just on memory? I am talking about Masters level here, not high school level biology.
I talked with a few users on another forum (which wasn't about science, I know I know, I did a mistake) and they "could not understand" what I was saying. I guess either they faked their background in science or is it really true that science (let's say, life sciences for instance) relies just on memory? I am talking about Masters level here, not high school level biology.