Does "wave–particle duality" exist in low frequency waves?

In summary: Then something happened that changed the rules: the rules of classical electromagnetism. In 1926, physicist Paul Dirac developed a mathematical transformation that explained how the rules of classical electromagnetism could be applied to the interactions between particles and waves. Today, classical electromagnetism is known as quantum mechanics.
  • #1
Dante Meira
22
5
Hello, I'm new to the forum, and Physics is not my area of study, but I have a doubt that I couldn't find a satisfactory answer on Google, so I created this account in this forum just to ask this, because I'm really curious to know the answer to this doubt.

Does "wave–particle duality" exist in low frequency waves? For example, the electromagnetic radiation used in the "long-wave" radio AM broadcast, can "manifest" this wave–particle duality? Or the Extremely low frequency (ELF) radio waves, with frequencies from 3 to 30 Hz, do they manifest wave–particle duality as well?

In other words, my doubt is: is there a minimum frequency of electromagnetic radiation for the "particle behavior" to be possible to be experimentally detected?

I could also extend the question and ask if there is a maximum frequency of electromagnetic radiation for it to be capable of behaving like a particle?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can think of a system where an elementary particle is trapped in a relatively large potential well, so that the spacing between its energy levels would be low enough for it to absorb radio frequency photons. Radio waves are also used in nuclear spin resonance spectroscopy, where the direction of the spin of a nucleus can change when it absorbs photons of low energy.
 
  • #3
hilbert2 said:
You can think of a system where an elementary particle is trapped in a relatively large potential well, so that the spacing between its energy levels would be low enough for it to absorb radio frequency photons. Radio waves are also used in nuclear spin resonance spectroscopy, where the direction of the spin of a nucleus can change when it absorbs photons of low energy.

Thank you.

Is there any theoretical minimum limit of frequency for the photons of low energy to actually interact as photons, that is, as particles?

For example, if someone creates electromagnetic radiation in the form of radio waves with a frequency of only 0.1 hertz (1 deci-hertz), can the low energy photons associated to those waves actually interact as particles?
 
  • #4
There can't be a sudden change in the laws of nature when going below some length- or timescale, e.g. electromagnetic waves behaving in one way if they have a wavelength of ##\lambda \geq 1 ##m and suddenly in another way if ##\lambda < 1##m. In principle, EM waves of any frequency can be absorbed as discrete energy packets by some physical system.

If you consider the spacings between translational motion energy levels in an ideal gas that is confined in a macroscopic container, you'll see that the corresponding photon wavelengths can be of the order of magnitude of light years.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Interesting theoretical question. I have never thought about a single photon emitting antenna at very long wavelengths in the hundreds of km range. Be a neat receiving antenna.
 
  • #6
Dante Meira said:
In other words, my doubt is: is there a minimum frequency of electromagnetic radiation for the "particle behavior" to be possible to be experimentally detected?.

Well first the wave particle duality doesn't exist - its an outmoded idea done away with when Dirac came up with his transformation theory (which generally goes by the name QM today), at the end of 1926, but probably sooner.

But to answer the above - no there isn't - its purely a technological issue just how long an EM wavelength can be before you can detect individual photons, theory places no limits at all.

This may seem strange because in beginner texts and popularizations the wave particle duality is of invoked to explain the double slit. Its not really a good explanation - here is a much better one:
https://arxiv.org/ftp/quant-ph/papers/0703/0703126.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 

1. What is "wave-particle duality" in low frequency waves?

"Wave-particle duality" is a concept in quantum mechanics that describes the behavior of particles as both waves and particles. This means that particles, such as electrons, can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties, depending on how they are observed and measured.

2. Can low frequency waves exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties?

Yes, low frequency waves can exhibit wave-particle duality just like high frequency waves. This concept is not limited to a specific frequency range, but rather applies to all particles at the quantum level.

3. How is the wave-particle duality of low frequency waves observed?

The wave-particle duality of low frequency waves is observed through experiments and observations in quantum mechanics. These experiments often involve passing low frequency waves through a double-slit apparatus, which results in an interference pattern that is characteristic of wave behavior.

4. What are some examples of low frequency waves that exhibit wave-particle duality?

Some examples of low frequency waves that exhibit wave-particle duality include radio waves, microwaves, and infrared light. These waves are all part of the electromagnetic spectrum and have been observed to exhibit both wave and particle properties.

5. How does the concept of wave-particle duality impact our understanding of low frequency waves?

The concept of wave-particle duality challenges our traditional understanding of particles and waves as distinct and separate entities. It also highlights the limitations of classical physics in explaining the behavior of particles at the quantum level. By understanding the wave-particle duality of low frequency waves, we can gain a deeper understanding of the fundamental nature of our universe.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
36
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
777
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Back
Top