Efforts to revive coal industry unlikely to work

In summary, a new study suggests that current federal efforts to revive the coal industry may have negative effects on Appalachian communities. It is argued that instead, the US should follow Germany's success in shifting towards solar energy and adapt to change by acquiring more advanced skills. The conversation also acknowledges the need to move away from fossil fuels for the benefit of humanity.
  • #1
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
4,446
558
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171027085523.htmCurrent federal efforts to revive the coal industry will likely do more harm than good to fragile Appalachian communities transitioning from coal as a major source of employment, according to a new study.

What do you think...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
We need to emulate German success and shift as much as possible to solar energy. A big part of the US is on the same latitude as Germany. Since the industrial revolution in the UK 200 years ago, societies had to learn to adapt to change and get re-trained with more advanced skills. Time to get all fossil fuels to rest, for good. Humanity used them for far too long.
 
  • #3
Hi Wolram, unfortunately this would open up a political can of worms and we no longer host political threads especially with the potential for CC discussion, so I'm afraid we need to close it.
 

What are the efforts being made to revive the coal industry?

There have been various efforts to revive the coal industry, including policy changes, subsidies, and investments in technology and infrastructure. However, these efforts have largely been unsuccessful due to market forces and the rise of alternative energy sources.

Why are these efforts unlikely to work?

The coal industry is facing numerous challenges, including declining demand, increased competition from renewable energy sources, and stricter regulations on emissions. These factors make it difficult for efforts to revive the industry to be successful in the long term.

What are the potential consequences of reviving the coal industry?

Reviving the coal industry could have negative consequences for the environment, public health, and the economy. Coal production and use contribute to air and water pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and health issues such as respiratory diseases. Additionally, investing in an industry that is in decline may not be a wise economic decision.

Are there any alternative solutions to reviving the coal industry?

Instead of focusing on reviving the coal industry, efforts could be directed towards supporting a just transition for coal workers and communities. This could involve providing training and job opportunities in renewable energy industries, as well as investing in infrastructure and revitalization projects in areas affected by the decline of the coal industry.

What is the role of scientists in the discussion on reviving the coal industry?

Scientists have an important role in providing evidence-based information and analysis on the impacts of the coal industry on the environment and public health. They can also contribute to the development of sustainable and equitable solutions for transitioning away from coal and towards cleaner energy sources.

Similar threads

  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top