I Eigenstate of two observable operators

Kavorka
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Let's say you have two operators A and B such that when they act on an eigenstate they yield a measurement of an observable quantity (so they're Hermitian). A and B do not commute, so they can't be measured simultaneously. My question is this: You have a matrix representation of A and B and you find their eigenvalues and corresponding eigenstates (eigenvectors), let's say they each have a basis of 3 eigenstates. My understanding is that if their eigenstate basis is not identical, they are not simultaneously measurable quantities and thus do not commute. What if A and B, which don't commute share a 1 eigenstate in common out of their 3 states? Does that mean that the two observables are simultaneously measurable when acting on that eigenstate? What if you had a mixed state, not a singular state, would there then be a probability of the observables being simultaneously measurable and a probability that they won't be? This wouldn't make sense to me in terms of non-commuting operators, but I'm not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sometimes non-commuting operators can have a common eigenstate "by accident", for example in the radial-symmetric s orbital states of a hydrogen atom all the components of orbital angular momentum are zero at the same time, while usually you can't measure the angular momentum components simultaneously.
 
hilbert2 said:
Sometimes non-commuting operators can have a common eigenstate "by accident", for example in the radial-symmetric s orbital states of a hydrogen atom all the components of orbital angular momentum are zero at the same time, while usually you can't measure the angular momentum components simultaneously.
So you would be able to measure the eigenvalues of the non-commuting operators simultaneously if they acted on the eigenstate they share?
 
Yes, you can measure all the components of orbital angular momentum of a hydrogen atom ground state as many times as you want and you always get the result zero and the state of the atom doesn't change in any way (at least in an idealized situation).
 
hilbert2 said:
Yes, you can measure all the components of orbital angular momentum of a hydrogen atom ground state as many times as you want and you always get the result zero and the state of the atom doesn't change in any way (at least in an idealized situation).
Does it being 0 make it a special case, or it can be any eigenvalue?

Also, if you had a mixed state, would that mean the probability of simultaneous measurement would be the product of the probabilities of finding the corresponding eigenvalue for each operator? Like if A had a 50% chance of yielding the eigenvalue of the eigenstate it shares with B, and B had a 30% chance of yielding that eigenvalue, then there would be a chance of simultaneous measurement of 15%? In effect, non-commuting operators means that they are not ALWAYS simultaneously measurable, but they could be sometimes? How can that be true if the commutator is ALWAYS non-zero?
 
You can also play with block diagonal matrices like
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 \\[0.3em]
0 & A \\[0.3em]
\end{bmatrix}

and

\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 \\[0.3em]
0 & B \\[0.3em]
\end{bmatrix}

where A and B are non-commuting hermitian matrices, and you'll see that they have at least one common eigenstate where both eigenvalues are 1.
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top