Eistein Podosky Rosen extended

  • Thread starter NateTG
  • Start date
In summary: This experiment is also interesting because it could potentially eliminate the need for Bell's theorem to explain non-locality.
  • #1
NateTG
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2,452
7
This is a question about a slightly modified version of the EPR experiment:

The experiment requires:
A source of entangled positron pairs
A source of entangels electron pairs
A pair of Stein-Gerlach type spin orientation detectors.

Let's say that there is a linear arrangement of
Detector - Positron source - Annihillation Chamber - Electron Source - Detector

And, I try to measure correlation between spin states of the electron at one end, and the positron at the other in a fashion similar to that of the EPR experiment.

Does QM - if it matters let's say the Copenhagen interpretation - indicate that there will be spin corellation between the pairs?

This experiment is interesting to me because it creates a situation where Bell's theorem may not be necessary to eliminate locality. Since any 'synconization pulse' would have to have taken place before the electron/postitron pair came into existence. On the other hand, AFAIK, the products of the Positron/Electron interaction have net spin zero, so a lack of correlation would indicate a violation of conservation of spin/angular momentum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, according to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, there should be spin correlation between the pairs. The theory suggests that the spins of the particles are correlated even before the measurement is made, and thus the measurements will show this correlation. In this example, since the positron and electron sources are both entangled, the particles should be in a state of entanglement prior to the measurements being made, which would result in a correlation in the measurements.
 

Related to Eistein Podosky Rosen extended

1. What is the "Einstein Podolsky Rosen extended" theory?

The Einstein Podolsky Rosen extended theory, also known as the EPR-Bohm theory, is a thought experiment proposed by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen in 1935. It challenges the principles of quantum mechanics and suggests that entangled particles can have instantaneous communication with each other, even if they are separated by large distances.

2. How does the EPR-extended theory differ from the original EPR paradox?

The EPR-extended theory builds upon the original EPR paradox by introducing the concept of hidden variables. These hidden variables are hypothetical properties of particles that determine their behavior and can account for the seemingly instantaneous communication between entangled particles.

3. What evidence supports the EPR-extended theory?

Although the EPR-extended theory is still a thought experiment and has not been proven experimentally, there have been several studies that suggest the existence of hidden variables. These include the Bell inequality tests and the delayed-choice quantum eraser experiment.

4. What are the implications of the EPR-extended theory?

If the EPR-extended theory is proven to be true, it would challenge the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics and have significant implications for our understanding of the universe. It could potentially lead to a new theory of physics that incorporates both quantum mechanics and relativity.

5. How does the EPR-extended theory relate to quantum entanglement?

The EPR-extended theory is closely related to quantum entanglement, as it suggests that entangled particles have a deeper connection than what is explained by quantum mechanics. It proposes that entangled particles are connected through hidden variables, which allows for instantaneous communication between them.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
682
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
79
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top