Electromagnetic Attenuation Conceptual Question

AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic wave intensity attenuates exponentially due to the proportional relationship between stimulated absorption and the amount of radiation present, resulting in an exponential decay function. For instance, if 1,000 photons enter a material with a 50% absorption rate per centimeter, only 500 photons remain after the first centimeter. This pattern continues, with each additional centimeter halving the remaining photons, leading to a consistent exponential decrease in intensity. The concept of halving thickness illustrates how each layer compounds the absorption effect, significantly reducing the transmitted radiation with each increment. This exponential attenuation is a fundamental principle in understanding electromagnetic wave behavior in various materials.
Orlando
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Why does electromagnetic wave intensity attenuate exponentially with depth from its incident intensity in an object? Why is the relationship exponential? I just need a nudge in the right direction or more if you are willing. Thank you for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the rate of stimulated absorption is proportional to the amount of radiation present, and the solution to this kind of differential equation is an exponential decay function.
 
Let's say that we have a group of 1,000 photons entering a material. Let us also say that every 1 cm has a 50% of absorbing each photon. So, 1,000 photons enter and 1 cm later we have approximately 500 left. Now, these 500 photons travel ANOTHER cm. What is the chance per photon to be absorbed? 50% still! So now we have about 250 photons left. These 250 travel another cm, leaving 125. And so on and so on.

So every cm reduces the amount of EM radiation by 50%. This is referred to as a halving thickness. Each layer you add multiplies the percents to absorb. Two layers is 50% x 50%, which is 0.5 x 0.5 = 0.25. So 25% of the radiation gets through while 75% is absorbed. Add 2 more layers is 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 = 0.0625. That is 6.25% of the radiation gets through and 93.75% is absorbed.
 
Excellent, thank you both
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top