Electron schwarzchild radius problem

In summary, the Schwarszchild radius of an electron is 1.353*10^-57m. To calculate the volume of a particle, assuming it is spherical, the formula is 4/3*pi*radius^3. This means that the volume of an electron at its Schwarszchild radius is 4/3*pi*1.353*10^-57^3, which is a very small number. This could be due to operator precedence confusion or an arithmetic underflow on the calculator. However, the concept of Schwarszchild radius does have some relevance to electrons, as seen in the idea of a black hole electron
  • #1
mrllama
1
0
The schwarszchild radius of an electron=1.353*10^-57m, and to work out the volume of a particle assuming it is spherical is 4/3*pi*radius^3 so the volume of an electron at its schwarzchild radius is 4/3*pi*1.353*10^-57^3 = 0??! WHAT DOES THIS MEAN :S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'd say it means you need to learn about operator precedence so that you don't confuse (10^-57)^3 with 10^-57^3 = 10^-185193, causing an arithmetic underflow on your calculator.
 
  • #3
May I suggest it's because the volume in cubic meters in less than 10^-99, hence your calculator figures this is as good as zero. Fair enough wouldn't you say!
 
  • #4
Anyways, applying the concept of Schwarzschild radius to an electron seems pointless.

EDIT: It appears it's not entirely pointless. There's even http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_electron"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5


The concept of the electron Schwarzschild radius is a theoretical calculation that is based on the assumption that an electron has a mass and can be treated as a point particle. However, this calculation does not have any physical significance because electrons are not point particles and do not have a defined radius. In fact, the concept of a particle having a radius is not applicable in the quantum world.

Furthermore, the calculated value of the electron Schwarzschild radius is extremely small and does not have any practical implications in our understanding of the electron. It is important to remember that these calculations are based on theoretical models and may not accurately represent the true nature of particles.

In summary, the concept of the electron Schwarzschild radius may be an interesting theoretical calculation, but it does not have any meaningful interpretation in our understanding of the electron. As scientists, it is important to critically evaluate and question these types of calculations in order to further our understanding of the natural world.
 

Related to Electron schwarzchild radius problem

1. What is the electron schwarzschild radius problem?

The electron schwarzschild radius problem refers to the theoretical calculation of the radius at which an electron would collapse into a black hole due to its mass and charge.

2. Why is the electron schwarzschild radius important?

The electron schwarzschild radius is important because it helps us understand the theoretical limits of the size of an electron and its potential to form a black hole.

3. Can an electron actually collapse into a black hole?

No, an electron cannot actually collapse into a black hole due to its extremely small mass and charge. The electron schwarzschild radius is a theoretical concept and does not apply to real-world scenarios.

4. How is the electron schwarzschild radius calculated?

The electron schwarzschild radius is calculated using the formula Rs = 2Gm/c^2, where G is the gravitational constant, m is the mass of the electron, and c is the speed of light.

5. Has the electron schwarzschild radius problem been solved?

The electron schwarzschild radius problem is still a subject of debate among scientists and has not yet been definitively solved. It is an ongoing area of research in theoretical physics.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
729
Replies
2
Views
934
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
107
Replies
19
Views
869
Replies
4
Views
465
Replies
14
Views
858
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
232
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
16
Views
1K
Back
Top