EM Radiation of "Permanent" Molecular Electric Dipoles

In summary, the conversation discusses the behavior of polar molecules when subjected to a high-frequency electric field and how they can radiate energy in the form of electromagnetic waves. The concept of a "closed polarization" current loop is also introduced, which can induce back-EMF and limit the amplitude of the current. The conversation also explores the self-interaction of polar molecules with their own local electric fields and the potential for dielectric materials to emit electromagnetic waves due to the acceleration of their permanent electric dipoles. The concept of dielectric loss and its relation to thermal noise is also mentioned.
  • #1
particlezoo
113
4
Suppose I were to subject a polar molecule to a high-frequency electric field. The polar molecule responds to the high-frequency electric field and thus it has a time-varying electric dipole moment vector. If we treated this as a classical electric dipole, it would be expected to radiate some of its internal energy in the form of electromagnetic waves. Of course, in quantum mechanics, this is not supposed to happen, otherwise such particles would constantly lose energy.

I can't help but wonder though, what if we had a ring of these "permanent" molecular electric dipoles that were oscillating, such that the produced electromagnetic field was essentially that of an alternating current in a closed loop? If we were to induce such an alternating "closed polarization" current loop, wouldn't the electric and magnetic fields of the permanent molecular dipoles collectively result in an outward-flowing Poynting vector, just as we might expect from the oscillation of induced dipoles?

Unlike the conduction current induced in a typical generator coil, the "closed polarization" current induced into a dielectric insulator would lead, not lag, with respect to the applied electric field (say, from an oscillating electromagnet). The electromagnetic field of the "closed polarization" current would induce a back-EMF into the electromagnet opposing changes in its current, and so the amplitude of the current through the electromagnet would reduce. Increasing the frequency of the applied electric field (i.e. increasing the frequency of the current through the electromagnet) would further increase this back-EMF, resisting even more the changes of current through the electromagnet, and thus limiting even more the amplitude of the current.

The magnetic field of the polarization currents would essentially be in phase (more or less) with respect to magnetic fields of the conduction currents in the electromagnet, as if to substitute for magnetization currents that would be produced by an iron core. Therefore, the back-EMF induced by such time-varying polarization currents would be out of phase with the currents in the electromagnet, and they would be off by 90 degrees if we neglect both propagation time delay as well as the dielectric relaxation time of the dielectric (i.e. the frequency, however high, is chosen to be low enough such that the oscillation period is much larger than the dielectric relaxation time of the insulator). The dielectric then behaves as if it possessed a frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility which is only exists for AC magnetic fields while being non-existent for DC magnetic fields.

There would exist macroscopic electric fields produced by the changing currents in both the electromagnet and the dielectric material that impose the property of inductance. However, what about the "local electric fields" inside the dielectric that manifest as internal stresses? The local electric fields would act on electric dipoles in the insulator, and thus a kind of "self-interaction" occurs. Now normally you would think that such local electric fields would oppose the externally applied electric field. That is true if the source of the applied electric field is a potential gradient (thus irrotational), as we see with a "charged" capacitor, but not if the source of the applied electric field is due to a changing magnetic field (thus solenoidal). If the local electric fields produced internally were in phase, rather than in anti-phase, with the applied solenoidal electric fields, then it is clear that the strain on the dipoles would be significantly increased as both the local electric fields and the externally-applied solenoidal electric field act on them in the same direction.

For a dielectric material consisting of polar molecules to interact with its own local electric fields is essentially a self-interaction-type phenomenon, as it is an object distributed over space. The object can be large enough to where it is not assumed to reveal any quantum statistical phenomenon, and yet underlying it are fundamentally quantum entities (polar molecules each possessing a re-orientable "permanent" electric dipole, in addition to induced dipoles caused by both external and local fields). Suppose the dielectric was transparent to the induced EM wave frequency. So does the acceleration of the "permanent" components of the electric dipoles (i.e. that of polar molecules) permit the emission of electromagnetic waves beyond the physical volume of the dielectric, and if so does it draw upon (in part, but not solely) the kinetic energy of molecular rotations and vibrations in the process?
Kevin M.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
particlezoo said:
Suppose the dielectric was transparent to the induced EM wave frequency. So does the acceleration of the "permanent" components of the electric dipoles (i.e. that of polar molecules) permit the emission of electromagnetic waves beyond the physical volume of the dielectric, and if so does it draw upon (in part, but not solely) the kinetic energy of molecular rotations and vibrations in the process?
My understanding is that, if driven by an alternating electric field, the electrons within a dielectric (other than vacuum) will experience acceleration and will radiate. And I presume therefore that if a dielectric has dielectric loss, it will possesses a noise temperature and will radiate radiate thermal noise.
 

1. What is EM radiation of "permanent" molecular electric dipoles?

EM radiation of "permanent" molecular electric dipoles refers to the process in which molecules with permanent electric dipoles emit electromagnetic radiation when exposed to an external electric field. This radiation can be in the form of microwaves, infrared, or even visible light.

2. How do molecules acquire permanent electric dipoles?

Molecules acquire permanent electric dipoles through a difference in electronegativity between atoms within the molecule. This results in an uneven distribution of electrons, causing one end of the molecule to have a slightly positive charge and the other end to have a slightly negative charge.

3. What is the significance of EM radiation of "permanent" molecular electric dipoles?

The EM radiation of "permanent" molecular electric dipoles plays a crucial role in many aspects of our daily lives. It is the basis for technologies such as radar and microwave ovens, and it also plays a significant role in the absorption and scattering of sunlight in our atmosphere.

4. Can EM radiation of "permanent" molecular electric dipoles be harmful?

In general, EM radiation of "permanent" molecular electric dipoles is not considered harmful as it falls within the non-ionizing portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. However, prolonged exposure to high levels of EM radiation can lead to heating effects and potentially cause harm.

5. How is EM radiation of "permanent" molecular electric dipoles related to climate change?

EM radiation of "permanent" molecular electric dipoles plays a significant role in the absorption and emission of energy in our atmosphere, which affects the Earth's climate. The increased levels of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, in our atmosphere can trap more EM radiation, leading to an increase in global temperatures and contributing to climate change.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
223
Replies
6
Views
772
  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
701
  • Classical Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
985
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
2
Views
79
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
0
Views
821
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
216
Back
Top