Equation to calculate absorbed dose of radiation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Littlegirloud
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the absorbed dose of radiation, the formula D = E/M is used, where D is the dose, E is the energy absorbed, and M is the mass of the tissue. For a tissue mass of 60 grams absorbing 420 Joules, the initial calculation gives D = 7 J/kg. However, since the mass must be converted to kilograms for standard reporting, the correct calculation is D = 420/0.06, resulting in an absorbed dose of 7000 J/kg. The importance of unit conversion is emphasized to ensure accurate reporting of radiation dose. The final value of 7000 J/kg is confirmed as correct.
Littlegirloud
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the absorbed dose of radiation for tissue that suffers a mean energy absorbed of 420 Joules in a quantity of tissue that has a mass of 60g.

Homework Equations


This is really my question. No relevant equation is provided in these materials so my independent research (and the data given) suggests I could use D = E/M, but is that the most appropriate?

The Attempt at a Solution


D = E\M
D = 420/60
D = 7
D = 7 J kg-1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Radiation dose is generally reported in terms of mean energy deposited per unit mass.

You might want to double check the 60 g vs kg though.
 
I've checked again and it is definitely 60 grams. Does that mean I need to equate the tissue dose to kg so it tallies with the final measure?

Perhaps?
D = E\M
D = 420/0.06
D = 7
D = 7000 J kg-1
 
Littlegirloud said:
I've checked again and it is definitely 60 grams. Does that mean I need to equate the tissue dose to kg so it tallies with the final measure?

Perhaps?
D = E\M
D = 420/0.06
D = 7
D = 7000 J kg-1
The final value looks good. I don't know what happened in the second to last line though.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top