Exotic stress-energy tensor and causality

In summary, It is not possible to construct a wormhole without exotic mass that violates the weak energy condition. The stress-energy tensor of this exotic matter must have only space-like components and may lead to causality violation. It is also possible that this exotic matter could result in infinite "creation of matter from nothing" under certain conditions. However, it is important to check if this matter violates the dominant energy condition, which would make it physically impossible.)
  • #1
Irigi
13
0
Hello everybody. I would like to kindly ask your help with a hypothetical hairy question about which I think a lot recently.

It is known fact, that it is not possible to construct a wormhole without exotic mass that violates the weak energy condition. It is also known that many quantum fields violate probably all known energy conditions to some degree, but this violation is usually so small that construction of a wormhole using this violation remains very implausible. I did some simple calculations to get some insight into this problem. While the Swarzschild metric

ds2 = -c2 (1 - rS / r) dt2 + (1 - rS / r)-1 dr2 + dΩ

gives zero stress-energy tensor (it is a vacuum solution), we may try to remove the curvature in the time-part and obtain "tunnel" in space without event horizon.

ds2 = -c2 dt2 + (1 - rS / r)-1 dr2 + dΩ

Such metric is consistent with stress-energy tensor

Tμν = - c4 rS / 8 π G r2 (r - rS) dr2 + c4 rS / 16 G π r (dΘ2 + sin2 Θ dφ2).

Such stress-energy tensor is traceless and consists of pure pressure, without rest mass. So my question is: Let us assume there is a form of matter that produces stress-energy tensor with only space-like components.
a) Does this immediately lead to a causality violation?
b) Does this inevitably lead to infinite "creation of matter from nothing"?

Example of such stress-energy tensor of point source satisfying conservation laws in Cartesian coordinates (I think):

Tμν = x / r3 (dx2 - dy2 - dz2) + y / r3 (dx dy + dy dx) + z / r3 (dx dz + dz dx)
About point a)
Here, I would like to avoid tachyons with space-like four-velocities creating the stress-energy tensor like Tμν ~ p uμ uν. Rather, I am asking if it is plausible that there would be some particle with negligible rest mass that produces strong field with stress-energy tensor like Tμν ~ p (uμ uν + gμν) + ρ uμ uν, where ρ ~ 0. Am I missing some implication of the stress-energy tensor on the interaction of the exotic matter with the regular matter?

About point b)
I know that there is this issue of infinite low potential energy. If one would allow negative mass, for example matter for which Tμν ~ - ρ uμuν, an empty space could spawn regular matter + this exotic matter and never stop. (Vacuum would be unstable, if you will.) But it seems to me that the pure space-like stress energy tensor does not cause this form of catastrophe. At least if the trace Tμμ is negative and therefore the same as for regular matter. Am I correct in this?

Thank you for all your answers and for your patience with my speculations. :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Irigi said:
Let us assume there is a form of matter that produces stress-energy tensor with only space-like components.
a) Does this immediately lead to a causality violation?

I haven't looked at your equations, but from your verbal description it sounds like your example violates the trace energy condition (TEC) and the dominant energy condition (DEC). The DEC is the condition you need in order to guarantee that there is no flux of energy propagating at speeds greater than c. Therefore the form of matter assumed in your example probably could be exploited to violate causality.

Irigi said:
b) Does this inevitably lead to infinite "creation of matter from nothing"?

To answer this, just calculate the divergence of your stress-energy tensor. It should be zero.
 
  • #3
Thank you very much for your reply!

bcrowell said:
I haven't looked at your equations, but from your verbal description it sounds like your example violates the trace energy condition (TEC) and the dominant energy condition (DEC). The DEC is the condition you need in order to guarantee that there is no flux of energy propagating at speeds greater than c. Therefore the form of matter assumed in your example probably could be exploited to violate causality.

I see, I wasn't aware of this. I can intuitively understand why DEC implies causality conservation. But does DEC violation automatically mean causality violation? Is there some theoretical example of classical matter that preserves causality and breaks the DEC? (Or some weaker condition guaranteeing the causality).

bcrowell said:
To answer this, just calculate the divergence of your stress-energy tensor. It should be zero.
This is not what I meant. Let us assume there are two matter fields T1μν and T2μν, which both satisfy

T1μν = 0,
T2μν = 0,

but for which

T1μν + T2μν = 0.

So the divergence is zero for each of them, but the matter still emerges from nothing. This cannot happen for normal matter, but for some sort of exotic matter that has trace of stress-energy tensor opposite to normal matter, it can. I wonder if some pathological thing like that can happen to my matter. (It cannot be exactly the same thing, since Tμν of matter satisfying energy conditions (normal matter) and matter violating them (my matter) cannot sum exactly to zero, but I wonder if there is some similar pathology present..

Thank you!
 
  • #4
In your case the energy momentum tensor, since it has to have the pressure and energy density in its diagonal form, would imply that you have both opposite energy density and pressure.
For the pressure it sounds normal to me (that's a feature of the vacuum)... But I don't really find a meaning in negative energy density.
 
  • #5
Irigi said:
I wonder if some pathological thing like that can happen to my matter.

Well, if ##T^{\mu \nu}{}_{; \nu} \neq 0## for your matter, then your matter is physically impossible, so it's a moot point, isn't it? (In other words, you need to check that *first*, before even bothering to wonder what any other implications are.)
 
  • #6
PeterDonis said:
Well, if ##T^{\mu \nu}{}_{; \nu} \neq 0## for your matter, then your matter is physically impossible, so it's a moot point, isn't it? (In other words, you need to check that *first*, before even bothering to wonder what any other implications are.)

This is a misunderstanding. My matter satisfies Tμν = 0. I was arguing that this condition is not enough to prevent creation of matter from nothing if (some particular form of) exotic matter is present, I never said I would like to violate energy/momentum conservation. I am interested in matter with following properties:

1) Tμν = 0
2) Tμνkμ kν ≥ 0 for every timelike vector field kμ (opposite of the weak energy condition).
3) Tμμ ≤ 0 (same as for regular matter)

(I am using convention -+++).

By other words, the matter conserves energy and the stress-energy tensor is space-like and corresponds to negative pressure. Now, I am interested what pathologies emerge for such matter (what strange things will happen that probably shouldn't?) and if there can be some additional condition that would provide causality. (For example: We forbid waves in such matter, because they would be tachyonic. Or: The matter acts on normal matter only by some special forces.. I wonder if there is a condition that would make it causal.)
 

Related to Exotic stress-energy tensor and causality

1. What is an exotic stress-energy tensor?

An exotic stress-energy tensor is a mathematical representation of the energy and momentum distribution in a physical system. It describes the density and flow of energy and momentum in a region of space, taking into account both matter and non-matter components.

2. How is the exotic stress-energy tensor different from a regular stress-energy tensor?

The exotic stress-energy tensor differs from a regular stress-energy tensor in that it includes non-matter components, such as negative energy densities, that violate the standard energy conditions of general relativity. This allows for the possibility of exotic phenomena, such as wormholes and time travel.

3. What does the exotic stress-energy tensor have to do with causality?

The exotic stress-energy tensor is directly related to causality because it describes the curvature of spacetime, which determines the paths that objects follow through space and time. If the tensor contains regions of negative energy density, it can create closed timelike curves, which could potentially violate causality by allowing for time travel.

4. Can the exotic stress-energy tensor be measured?

Currently, there is no experimental evidence for the existence of exotic stress-energy tensors, and they are primarily used in theoretical models. However, scientists continue to search for ways to detect and measure these tensors, which could provide further insights into the nature of space and time.

5. Are there any real-world applications for understanding exotic stress-energy tensors?

While the existence of exotic stress-energy tensors is still a subject of debate and research, understanding them could have significant implications for our understanding of the universe. If they do exist, they could potentially be harnessed for advanced technologies, such as creating traversable wormholes or manipulating the fabric of spacetime.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
93
Views
9K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top