Expert Witness Testimony: Accident Analysis

In summary, the question involves determining the speed of car A when it hit car B in an accident on a hill with a slope of 12.0°. Given that the cars were initially separated by a distance of 23.5 m and the speed of car A at the onset of braking was 17.5 m/s, and the coefficient of kinetic friction was 0.60 for a dry road surface, the speed of car A hitting car B was calculated to be 5.476 m/s. The slope of the hill was neglected in the initial calculation, leading to an incorrect answer.
  • #1
InsTanCeZ
4
0

Homework Statement



You testify as an "expert witness" in a case involving an accident in which car A slid into the rear of car B, which was stopped at a red light along a road headed down a hill. You find that the slope of the hill is θ = 12.0°, that the cars were separated by distance d = 23.5 m when the driver of car A put the car into a slide (it lacked any automatic anti-brake-lock system), and that the speed of car A at the onset of braking was v0 = 17.5 m/s.

(a) With what speed did car A hit car B if the coefficient of kinetic friction was 0.60 (dry road surface)?

(b) What was the speed if the coefficient of kinetic friction was 0.10 (road surface covered with wet leaves)?

Homework Equations



∑F = ma = μmg

v² = v₀² + 2aΔx

The Attempt at a Solution



∑F = ma = μmg
a = μg
= 0.600(-9.80m/s²)
= -5.88m/s²

v² = v₀² + 2aΔx
= (17.5m/s)² + 2(-5.88m/s²)(23.5m)
= 5.476m/s (part a)

haven't tried part b

How is this wrong? My online homework said 5.467 wasn't the answer for part a.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
InsTanCeZ said:

Homework Statement



You testify as an "expert witness" in a case involving an accident in which car A slid into the rear of car B, which was stopped at a red light along a road headed down a hill. You find that the slope of the hill is θ = 12.0°, that the cars were separated by distance d = 23.5 m when the driver of car A put the car into a slide (it lacked any automatic anti-brake-lock system), and that the speed of car A at the onset of braking was v0 = 17.5 m/s.

(a) With what speed did car A hit car B if the coefficient of kinetic friction was 0.60 (dry road surface)?

(b) What was the speed if the coefficient of kinetic friction was 0.10 (road surface covered with wet leaves)?

Homework Equations



∑F = ma = μmg

v² = v₀² + 2aΔx

The Attempt at a Solution



∑F = ma = μmg
a = μg
= 0.600(-9.80m/s²)
= -5.88m/s²

v² = v₀² + 2aΔx
= (17.5m/s)² + 2(-5.88m/s²)(23.5m)
= 5.476m/s (part a)

haven't tried part b

How is this wrong? My online homework said 5.467 wasn't the answer for part a.
It has to to do with you neglecting the slope of the road.
 
  • #3
Thanks, I figured it out. :)
 

What is expert witness testimony?

Expert witness testimony is a form of evidence provided by a qualified individual who has specialized knowledge and experience in a particular field relevant to a legal case. This testimony is used to help the court understand complex or technical information and to aid in decision-making.

What is the purpose of expert witness testimony in accident analysis?

The purpose of expert witness testimony in accident analysis is to provide an objective, scientific evaluation of the evidence related to an accident. This can include analyzing physical evidence, reconstructing the accident, and providing an expert opinion on the cause or contributing factors of the accident.

What qualifications does an expert witness in accident analysis need?

An expert witness in accident analysis should have a combination of education, training, and experience in a relevant field such as engineering, physics, or forensics. They should also have experience in providing expert testimony and be able to effectively communicate complex information to a non-technical audience.

How is expert witness testimony in accident analysis different from regular witness testimony?

Expert witness testimony differs from regular witness testimony in that it is provided by an individual with specialized knowledge and training in a particular field. Expert witnesses are also allowed to provide opinions and conclusions based on their analysis of the evidence, whereas regular witnesses are only allowed to testify about what they personally saw or experienced.

What is the importance of expert witness testimony in accident analysis?

Expert witness testimony is important in accident analysis because it can provide a scientific and unbiased perspective on the evidence. This can help the court make a more informed decision on the cause or contributing factors of the accident and can also assist in determining liability and potential damages.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
20K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
4K
Back
Top