Find Proofs for the following 5 propositional logic statements

In summary: I think.In summary, we have shown that the following statements hold true in propositional logic: 1) P ⊢ P 2) P → Q, Q→R ⊢ P → R 3) P → Q, Q→R, ¬R ⊢ ¬P 4) Q→R ⊢ (PvQ) → (PvR) 5) P →Q ⊢ (P&R) → (Q&R) We used various methods such as hypothetical syllogism, conditional proof, modus ponens, and contradiction to prove these statements.
  • #1
josephmary
1
0
i came acroos the below while studying propositional Logic, can anyone find the proofs

1) P ⊢ P

2) P → Q, Q→R ⊢ P → R

3) P → Q, Q→R, ¬R ⊢ ¬P

4) Q→R ⊢ (PvQ) → (PvR)

5) P →Q ⊢ (P&R) → (Q&R)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Can you state the axioms you are allowed to use?
 
  • #3
josephmary said:
i came acroos the below while studying propositional Logic, can anyone find the proofs

1) P ⊢ P

2) P → Q, Q→R ⊢ P → R

3) P → Q, Q→R, ¬R ⊢ ¬P

4) Q→R ⊢ (PvQ) → (PvR)

5) P →Q ⊢ (P&R) → (Q&R)

1)$P$..................Assumption

2)$\neg P$................Hypothesis for contradiction

3)$P\wedge\neg P$............(1),(2) and using addition Introdaction

4)$\neg\neg P$..................From (2) to (3) and using contradiction

5) $P$..................(4) negation elimination

(2) and (3) are easy to do ,you can use hypothetical syllogism for (2) or conditional proof and modus ponens

And hypothetical syllogism , contrapositive and modus ponens for (3) or contradiction,and modus ponens

I will do (4) :

1)$Q\Rightarrow R$..............Assumption

2)$P\vee Q$..................Hypothesis for conditional proof

3)$\neg(P\vee R)$................Hypothesis for contraction

4)$(\neg P\wedge\neg R)$............From (3) and using de Morgan

5)$\neg P$..................(4), Addition elimination (AE)

6)$\neg R$..................(4),AE

7)$\neg R\Rightarrow\neg Q$.............(1),Contrapositive

8)$\neg Q$..................(6),(7),Modus Ponens(MP)

9)$\neg P\Rightarrow Q$..............(2),material implication

10)$Q$.....................(5),(9) MP

11)$Q\wedge\neg Q$................(8),(10) Addition Introduction (AI)

12)$\neg\neg(P\vee R)$...............from (3) to (11) and using contradiction

13)$(P\vee R)$...................(12),negation elimination

14)$(P\vee Q)\Rightarrow(P\vee R)$............from (2) to (13) and using conditional proof

(5) is on the same style with (4) and even easier
 

1. What is propositional logic?

Propositional logic is a branch of mathematical logic that deals with the logical relationships between propositions, which are statements that can either be true or false. It is used to analyze and reason about the validity of arguments and statements.

2. What is a proof in propositional logic?

A proof in propositional logic is a sequence of logical deductions that demonstrate the validity of a given statement or argument. It involves applying logical rules and principles to manipulate and combine propositions in order to arrive at a conclusion.

3. How do you find proofs for propositional logic statements?

To find proofs for propositional logic statements, you need to use logical inference rules and techniques, such as modus ponens, modus tollens, and the law of syllogism. These rules allow you to manipulate and combine propositions in a systematic way to reach a logical conclusion.

4. What is the importance of finding proofs in propositional logic?

Finding proofs in propositional logic is important because it allows us to determine the validity of arguments and statements. It helps us to identify logical fallacies and inconsistencies, and to make sound and well-supported conclusions based on evidence and reasoning.

5. Are there any limitations to finding proofs in propositional logic?

Yes, there are limitations to finding proofs in propositional logic. It is a formal system that only deals with propositions that are either true or false, and it cannot account for the complexities and nuances of natural language. It also cannot address issues of ambiguity or uncertainty, which may arise in real-world situations.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
875
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
941
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top