MHB Find Work to Empty Conical Frustum Tank - Juan's Question at Yahoo Answers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to pump water out of a conical frustum tank. The tank's dimensions are provided, and the weight of water is stated as 62.5 lb/ft³. The approach involves decomposing the tank into horizontal slices, determining the volume and weight of each slice, and integrating to find the total work done. The final formula for work is derived, resulting in a value of 1188000π ft·lb. This calculation illustrates the application of calculus in solving real-world physics problems related to fluid dynamics.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

A tank is full of water. Find the work required to pump the water out of the spout. Use the fact that water...?

A tank is full of water. Find the work required to pump the water out of the spout. Use the fact that water weighs 62.5 lb/ft3. (Assume r = 6 ft, R = 12 ft, and h = 24 ft.)

*Picture*

View attachment 1237

___ft-lb___6.4, 5

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 

Attachments

  • juancone.jpg
    juancone.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 157
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Juan,

Let's orient a vertical $y$-axis coinciding with the axis of symmetry of the tank, with the origin at the top surface and the positive direction is down. Let us the decompose the tank into horizontal circular slices, where the radius of each slice decreases linearly as $y$ increases. We may let $r_y$ denote the radius of an arbitrary slice.

We know:

$$r_y(0)=R,\,r_y(h)=r$$

Hence:

$$r_y(y)=\frac{r-R}{h}y+R$$

And so the volume of the arbitrary slice is:

$$dV=\pi\left(\frac{r-R}{h}y+R \right)^2\,dy$$

Now, the weight $w$ of this slice can be found from the fact that weight is mass times the acceleration due to gravity, and mass is mass density $\rho$ times volume. Thus:

$$w=mg=g\rho dV=\pi g\rho\left(\frac{r-R}{h}y+R \right)^2\,dy$$

Now, the work done to lift this slice to the top of the tank is:

$$dW=Fd$$

Where the applied force $F$ is the weight of the slice, and the distance over which this force is applied is $y$. And so we have:

$$dW=\pi g\rho y\left(\frac{r-R}{h}y+R \right)^2\,dy$$

Expanding the square, and distributing the $y$, we have:

$$dW=\pi g\rho\left(\left(\frac{r-R}{h} \right)^2y^3+\frac{2R(r-R)}{h}y^2+R^2y \right)\,dy$$

Summing up all the work elements by integrating, we obtain:

$$W=\pi g\rho\int_0^h \left(\frac{r-R}{h} \right)^2y^3+\frac{2R(r-R)}{h}y^2+R^2y\,dy$$

$$W=\pi g\rho\left[\left(\frac{r-R}{2h} \right)^2y^4+\frac{2R(r-R)}{3h}y^3+\frac{R^2}{2}y^2 \right]_0^h=\pi g\rho\left(\left(\frac{r-R}{2h} \right)^2h^4+\frac{2R(r-R)}{3h}h^3+\frac{R^2}{2}h^2 \right)$$

$$W=\pi g\rho h^2\left(\left(\frac{r-R}{2} \right)^2+\frac{2R(r-R)}{3}+\frac{R^2}{2} \right)=\frac{\pi g\rho h^2}{12}\left(3r^2+2rR+R^2 \right)$$

Using the given data:

$$g\rho=62.5\frac{\text{lb}}{\text{ft}^3},\,h=24 \text{ ft},\,r=6\text{ ft},\,R=12\text{ ft}$$

we find:

$$W=\frac{\pi\left(62.5\frac{\text{lb}}{\text{ft}^3} \right)\left(24\text{ ft} \right)^2}{12}\left(3\left(6\text{ ft} \right)^2+2\left(6\text{ ft} \right)\left(12\text{ ft} \right)+\left(12\text{ ft} \right)^2 \right)=1188000\pi\text{ ft}\cdot\text{lb}$$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top