Force diagram for ring/bead problem

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem involving a ring with two sliding beads of different masses. It is shown that the ring will start to rise if the mass of one bead is greater than 3 times the mass of the ring, and the angle at which this occurs is found. The conversation also delves into finding the kinetic energy and velocity of the beads, as well as the centripetal acceleration and forces exerted on the ring. The concept of a radial force and its vertical and horizontal components is also discussed to understand how the beads are able to stay on the ring without falling off.
  • #1
PhizKid
477
1

Homework Statement


A ring of mass M hangs from a thread, and two beads of mass m slide on it without friction. The beads are released simultaneously from the top of the ring and slide down opposite sides. Show that the ring will start to rise if m > 3M/2, and find the angle at which this occurs.


Homework Equations


F = ma
Kinetic/potential energy


The Attempt at a Solution


jtkZN.png


The ring is supposed to rise when the Normal force overcomes the gravitational force on the ring, but how is the Normal force supposed to point directly upward? There is no component of the Normal force that goes up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I assume the beads are constrained to travel along the ring and either miss each other or collide in a perfectly elastic manner at the bottom.
 
  • #3
Yes, but for our problem we don't care what happens after the ring rises (assuming the ring rises before the beads collide, in which case here the ring does indeed rise before the rings reach the bottom).
 
  • #4
I cannot visualize how the ring can rise when the beads are falling. I can, when the beads are rising, though.
 
  • #5
Right, I thought it was unintuitive as well. But apparently the mathematics of the physics work out, which is what I am trying to do with the force diagram, but I can't seem to get it
 
  • #6
The kinetic energy of the beads depends on their angular position. Find it, and find the corresponding velocity.

Then, since the motion if circular you should be able to find out the centripetal acceleration of the beads at any given angle. From that, you should be able to figure out the forces the beads are exerting on the hoop; then find their vertical components.
 
  • #7
I've already found the KE/velocity: KE = mg*(R - Rcos(x)) and I can get the velocity from there. And I know the net force on the bead is N - mgcos(x) which is = m(v^2/R). But I don't know how to make any force diagram that will make the ring go vertically upwards.
 
  • #8
You have two forces exerted by a bead: one related to its curved motion, which acts radially outward; another is due to its weight, acting vertically down. You can find the vertical component of the radial force; the horizontal components of the two beads' radial forces will cancel each other.
 
  • #9
This is what I don't understand. If I decompose the Normal force and the gravitational force based on the axes I set up in my picture, there is a net force pointing southeast. So what cancels out here?
 
  • #10
Hi PhizKid! :smile:
PhizKid said:
The ring is supposed to rise when the Normal force overcomes the gravitational force on the ring, but how is the Normal force supposed to point directly upward? There is no component of the Normal force that goes up.

I don't understand. :redface:

The normal force on/from the beads is at an angle, and always has a component in the vertical direction (except at the ±90° positions).

(but you don't need the forces …

how can the center of mass accelerate faster than g? :wink:)
 
  • #11
But then you would need to make a new set of axes:

PKYQv.png


But I don't think this would be of any help?
 
  • #12
PhizKid said:
But then you would need to make a new set of axes …

what's new about vertical and horizontal? :confused:

even the ancient greeks knew about them! :rolleyes:

get on with it! :smile:
 
  • #13
I don't know how to solve this without using forces. But the center of mass isn't moving but it would move vertically upwards if the Normal force pointing upwards was greater than the force of gravity
 
  • #14
You have a radial force, at some angle from the vertical. You can surely project the force to the vertical and horizontal axes.
 
  • #15
The radial force is the same thing as the normal force, or is it something different?
 
  • #16
Not exactly. The centripetal acceleration is due to two forces: the reaction force (normal) and gravity. The radial component of this combined force is what I call the radial force (even though its direction is the same as that of the normal force).
 
  • #17
The only force to decompose is the gravitational force, in which one component is parallel to the normal force radially, and the other component is tangential to the ring. I don't understand where this is going
 
  • #18
Again, get the radial force first. That is easy to do, because all you need is the velocity and the radius, which you have. Then get the vertical component of this force, and subtract the force of gravity from it; this gives you the vertical component of the normal force, but mind the signs.
 
  • #19
PhizKid said:
There is no component of the Normal force that goes up.

I think you're trying to see conceptually how either bead can exert a normal force on the wire that has a vertical component that is upward. Near the top of the loop, the wire exerts a normal force on the bead that is radially outward, as you have drawn in your first drawing. So, the bead exerts a normal force on the wire that is radially inward (and therefore has a vertical component downward.) But think about what happens as the bead continues farther along the loop. You might be familiar with the problem of something sliding down a frictionless spherical surface (see attachment). At some point the object leaves the surface! What prevents the bead from leaving the wire loop?
 

Attachments

  • slide on spherical surface.gif
    slide on spherical surface.gif
    6.8 KB · Views: 801
  • #20
voko said:
Again, get the radial force first. That is easy to do, because all you need is the velocity and the radius, which you have. Then get the vertical component of this force, and subtract the force of gravity from it; this gives you the vertical component of the normal force, but mind the signs.

I'm not sure what "radial force" means. I thought the radial force was N - mgcos(x) = m(v^2/R)? What other force is there?

TSny said:
I think you're trying to see conceptually how either bead can exert a normal force on the wire that has a vertical component that is upward. Near the top of the loop, the wire exerts a normal force on the bead that is radially outward, as you have drawn in your first drawing. So, the bead exerts a normal force on the wire that is radially inward (and therefore has a vertical component downward.) But think about what happens as the bead continues farther along the loop. You might be familiar with the problem of something sliding down a frictionless spherical surface (see attachment). At some point the object leaves the surface! What prevents the bead from leaving the wire loop?

The object leaves the surface because the Normal force becomes 0 since it loses contact. In this problem, the bead can't because it's attached to the ring.

So do I have to think about the forces on the beads and the forces on the ring separately?
 
  • #21
PhizKid said:
I'm not sure what "radial force" means. I thought the radial force was N - mgcos(x) = m(v^2/R)? What other force is there?

Again. The net force on the bead is the normal force plus its weight. This net force can be decomposed into two components: one radial and another tangential to the ring. The radial component of the net force (radial force for short) is responsible for the centripetal acceleration; this is the equation you have above. The other force is the tangential force, which you don't care about, because you can obtain the normal force from the equation for the radial force alone.
 
  • #22
Thanks, TSny--I see what you mean. Facepalm.
 
  • #23
Oh, so once I have the net radial force, I decompose that into its horizontal/vertical components? So it's like decomposing within decomposing or something similar?
 
  • #24
PhizKid said:
Oh, so once I have the net radial force, I decompose that into its horizontal/vertical components? So it's like decomposing within decomposing or something similar?

Correct. Note the two beads will product twice the vertical component, while their horizontal components cancel - so all that remains is pure vertical force.
 
  • #25
But this vertical force is on the beads from the ring, right? So it's pointing in the same direction as the gravitational force is initially pointing. Where are we going with this?
 
  • #26
The radial force is due to the normal force AND the radial component of the weight. Given the radial force, you can obtain just the normal force (that's equation you got earlier). Find the vertical component of this normal force - that's what lifts the ring up.
 

1. What is a force diagram?

A force diagram is a visual representation of the forces acting on an object. It shows the direction and magnitude of each force, and can help to analyze the motion of the object.

2. How do you draw a force diagram?

To draw a force diagram for a ring or bead problem, first identify all the forces acting on the object. Then, draw an arrow for each force, showing the direction and magnitude. Make sure the arrows are proportional to the strength of the force. Finally, label each arrow with the type of force it represents.

3. What are the common forces included in a force diagram for a ring/bead problem?

The most common forces included in a force diagram for a ring/bead problem are gravity, tension, and normal force. Other forces may also be present, depending on the specific problem, such as friction or air resistance.

4. How can a force diagram help solve a ring/bead problem?

A force diagram can help solve a ring/bead problem by providing a visual representation of all the forces involved. This can help to identify any unbalanced forces and determine the resulting motion of the object. It can also be used to calculate the net force and acceleration of the object.

5. Are there any limitations to using a force diagram for a ring/bead problem?

While force diagrams are a useful tool for analyzing the motion of an object, they have some limitations. For example, they do not take into account the shape or size of the object, and they assume that all forces act at a single point. In more complex problems, other methods of analysis may be necessary.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
355
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
639
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
4K
Back
Top