Fractal LQG spacetime and renormalization of the Immirzi parameter

In summary, the conversation discusses the idea of treating spacetime as a fractal in causal dynamical triangulations and loop quantum gravity. This would involve a nesting of spin networks and a running Immirzi parameter. The idea is related to a paper on fractal quantum space-time and another on fractal dimension in 3D spin-foams. The talk also mentions a paper on fractal space-time from spin-foams and the calculation of the spectral dimension of space-time in 4D quantum gravity. The conversation concludes with a suggestion to seek comments from someone like f-h on this idea.
  • #1
tom.stoer
Science Advisor
5,779
172
Hi,

this is not based on detailed work but just an idea which arised comparing causal dynamical triangulations and loop quantum gravity.

In CDT it seems reasonable to treat spacetime as a fractal. That means there is no limit or minimum length in the triangulations, but the triangulations are "nested" like a fractal. This corresponds to coarse graining like the block-spin transformations in the renormalization group approach for the Ising model.

Wouldn't it be possible to apply a similar method in LQG? That would mean nesting of spin networks. In a sense a vertex would be an effective description of a volume which (via coarse graining) resolves into finer volumina with new vertices. In one paper studying LQG black holes I found a similar idea. The isolated horizon in LQG translates into the idea that one can replace all vertices (intertwiners) forming the spacetime inside the horizon by one single huge (!) interwiner representing the whole black hole.

If one applies this idea to LQG as a whole one must answer the question what happens with a minimum length. This could be achieved via renormalization of the Immirzi parameter. So coarse graining of spin networks goes hand in hand with a running Immirzi parameter. Btw.: the length, area and volume operators are not necessarily Dirac observables, therefore their quantized spectrum does not automatically carry over to physical observables.

Does this idea make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
tom.stoer said:
... In one paper studying LQG black holes I found a similar idea. The isolated horizon in LQG translates into the idea that one can replace all vertices (intertwiners) forming the spacetime inside the horizon by one single huge (!) interwiner representing the whole black hole...

That reminds me of this paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.4916
 
  • #3
Thanks for the reference; this is the paper I am talking about.

What do you think? Am I crazy or could this be a viable picture of LQG spacetime?
 
  • #4
I can't say anything useful, Tom. The idea of progressively refining spin networks while letting some parameter run is attractive. It would be related to LQG, but something different.
I'm too sleepy to think about it right now. It would be nice if someone like f-h would comment. I will turn in now and get back to it in the morning.
 
  • #5
literature

Fractal Quantum Space-Time
Leonardo Modesto
In this paper we calculated the spectral dimension of loop quantum gravity (LQG) using the scaling property of the area operator spectrum on spin-network states and using the scaling property of the volume and length operators on Gaussian states. We obtained that the spectral dimension of the spatial section runs from 1.5 to 3, and under particular assumptions from 2 to 3 across a 1.5 phase when the energy of a probe scalar field decreases from high to low energy in a fictitious time T. We calculated also the spectral dimension of space-time using the scaling of the area spectrum operator calculated on spin-foam models. The main result is that the effective dimension is 2 at the Planck scale and 4 at low energy. This result is consistent with two other approaches to non perturbative quantum gravity: "causal dynamical triangulation" and "asymptotically safe quantum gravity". We studied the scaling properties of all the possible curvature invariants and we have shown that the singularity problem seems to be solved in the covariant formulation of quantum gravity in terms of spin-foam models. For a particular form of the scaling (or for a particular area operator spectrum) all the curvature invariants are regular also in the Trans-Planckian regime.

Fractal Dimension in 3d Spin-Foams
Francesco Caravelli, Leonardo Modesto
In this paper we perform the calculation of the spectral dimension of the space-time in 3d quantum gravity using the dynamics of the Ponzano-Regge vertex (PR) and its quantum group generalization (Turaev-Viro model (TV)). We realize this considering a very simple decomposition of the 3d space-time and introducing a boundary state which selects a classical geometry on the boundary. We obtain that the spectral dimension of the space-time runs from 2 to 3, across a 1.5 phase, when the energy of a probe scalar field decreases from high to low energy. For the TV model the spectral dimension at hight energy increase with the value of the cosmological constant. At low energy the presence of the cosmological constant does not change the spectral dimension.


Fractal Space-Time from Spin-Foams
Elena Magliaro, Claudio Perini, Leonardo Modesto
In this paper we perform the calculation of the spectral dimension of spacetime in 4d quantum gravity using the Barrett-Crane (BC) spinfoam model. We realize this considering a very simple decomposition of the 4d spacetime already used in the graviton propagator calculation and we introduce a boundary state which selects a classical geometry on the boundary. We obtain that the spectral dimension of the spacetime runs from $\approx 2$ to 4, across a $\approx 1.5$ phase, when the energy of a probe scalar field decreases from high $E \lesssim E_P/25$ to low energy. The spectral dimension at the Planck scale $E \approx E_P$ depends on the areas spectrum used in the calculation. For three different spectra $l_P^2 \sqrt{j(j+1)}$, $l_P^2 (2 j+1)$ and $l_P^2 j$ we find respectively dimension $\approx 2.31$, 2.45 and 2.08.
 
  • #7
thanks for the references ... so I will cancel my flight to Stockholm :-)
 

1. What is Fractal LQG spacetime?

Fractal LQG spacetime is a theoretical model that combines elements of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) and fractal geometry. It suggests that spacetime is not continuous, but instead is made up of discrete, fractal-like structures.

2. How is the Immirzi parameter related to Fractal LQG spacetime?

The Immirzi parameter is a constant in Loop Quantum Gravity that determines the size of the smallest possible area in the theory. In Fractal LQG spacetime, the Immirzi parameter is renormalized, meaning its value changes at different scales, reflecting the fractal nature of spacetime.

3. What is renormalization in the context of Fractal LQG spacetime?

Renormalization is a process in physics where certain parameters, such as the Immirzi parameter, are adjusted to account for the effects of different scales. In Fractal LQG spacetime, renormalization takes into account the discrete and self-similar nature of spacetime at different scales.

4. How does Fractal LQG spacetime differ from other theories of quantum gravity?

Fractal LQG spacetime differs from other theories of quantum gravity in that it incorporates fractal geometry and renormalization into the framework of Loop Quantum Gravity. It also suggests that spacetime is not continuous, but instead is made up of discrete and self-similar structures.

5. Can Fractal LQG spacetime be tested or observed?

As with many theories in quantum gravity, it is currently not possible to directly test or observe Fractal LQG spacetime. However, some aspects of the theory, such as the renormalization of the Immirzi parameter, may have implications for observable phenomena in the universe, and further research and experiments may provide evidence for or against the theory.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
517
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
879
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
102
Views
26K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top