Geometry of the Universe varying in time?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the universe's density and its geometry, specifically the parameter k in the Robertson-Walker metric, which indicates whether the universe is closed, open, or flat. It is suggested that while density decreases over time due to cosmic expansion, this does not necessarily lead to a change in k, as long as the density distribution remains homogeneous and isotropic. The geometry of the universe is ultimately determined by the ratio of actual density to critical density, which remains stable throughout the universe's evolution. Participants express curiosity about whether fluctuations in density could affect k, but the consensus is that the fundamental geometry remains unchanged. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding critical density calculations to assess the universe's spatial geometry.
Gio83
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
In the expression of the Robertson-Walker metric for an expanding universe, the parameter k is allowed to be 1, -1, 0 if the universe is respectively closed, open or flat. But Einstein says that the density of the matter content of the universe determines its geometry: can we think about a time-dependence of k during the evolution of the Universe? I've never found such an approach in books, so I wanted to know if someone ever heard about that.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Gio83 said:
In the expression of the Robertson-Walker metric for an expanding universe, the parameter k is allowed to be 1, -1, 0 if the universe is respectively closed, open or flat. But Einstein says that the density of the matter content of the universe determines its geometry: can we think about a time-dependence of k during the evolution of the Universe? I've never found such an approach in books, so I wanted to know if someone ever heard about that.

k doesn't change if the universe is homogeneous and isotropic, which seems to be reasonably close to reality for the observable universe on larges scales. Note that this does not imply that density of the universe is constant in time.
 
George Jones said:
homogeneous and isotropic, which seems to be reasonably close to reality for the observable universe


This now seems to be a rally point, i do not have the evidence , but how doe's this image reality?
 
Yes, the density of matter is a decreasing function of time due to the expansion of space, right?
But I was wondering if this decrease of density could affect the geometry of the universe, changing the value of k. Say, during a phase of high density the universe could be described by a closed geometry, while in a phase after the expansion, when the density is minor, it could be described by a flat or open geometry.
Or maybe the decrease of density doesn't affect the geometry as long as the density distribution itself is homogeneous? Is that what you mean?

(sorry if make mistakes writing in english...)
 
I'd like to throw in some background information, Gio---hopefully not getting in the way of George's response.

Spatial geometry is not determined merely by density alone, but by a ratio Omega which tells how the actual density at a given moment compares with the critical density at that moment.

You can learn to calculate what that critical density is, at the present time, if you want. There is a simple formula for it, involving the square of the Hubble parameter H---this H is currently estimated at around 71 km/s per Megaparsec. Please say if you want the formula for critical density.

The actual density and the critical density are both gradually changing. But their ratio stays in the same range (either always less than 1, or always equal 1, or always bigger than 1) and so the basic feature of geometry, the "k", stays unchanged as the standard model universe evolves.
=====================

Gio, assuming it is not a nuisance to have the extra information. Here is the formula for calculating the critical density:

3H2/(8 pi G)

You know what H is (namely 71 km/s per Megaparsec) and you know pi=3.14, and you know Newton's constant G. So should be a cinch to calculate it. And a neat way is to use the Google calculator which has things like pi and G built in.
You just put this into the box and press return:

3(71 km/s per Mpc)^2/(8 pi G)

That will calculate something for you and give you the answer in kilograms per cubic meter. I prefer to have the answer as an energy density, so what I prefer to put into the Google calculator is:

3c^2(71 km/s per Mpc)^2/(8 pi G) in joules/km^3

Then it gives me the answer as an energy density in joules per cubic kilometer. You can see I inserted a c^2 to change it from mass density to equivalent energy density. Google calculator is flexible: it will give you the answer in the units you specify. It is fun to use. And it is a great timesaver because it already knows many constants, like the mass of the sun, the charge of the electron, Newton G, Boltzmann k, etc etc. You seldom have to look anything up in a handbook.

So this critical density that we just calculated is what you have to compare the REAL density of the universe to, if you want to know the spatial geometry.
 
Last edited:
thanks a lot, all of you!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top