Gravity: An Emergent Phenomenon According to Theoretical Physicist Erik Verlinde

  • Thread starter jaquecusto
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Gravity
In summary, Verlinde's theory proposes that gravity is an emergent phenomenon that arises from the collective behavior of microscopic particles and the way information is processed and stored in the universe. It explains the behavior of gravity in the absence of matter as arising from the entanglement of information between particles. Verlinde's theory does not necessarily contradict general relativity, but offers a different perspective on how gravity works. It has not yet been fully tested or proven, but ongoing experiments and observations may help support or disprove it in the future. If proven accurate, it could greatly impact our understanding of the universe and lead to new developments in cosmology and quantum mechanics.
  • #1
jaquecusto
12
0
Hi, All!

I found this interesting interview with Erik Verlinde:

Gravity Doesn't Exist

ERIK VERLINDE
Theoretical Physicist

The theoretical physicist believes that gravity is an emergent phenomenon, not the elemental "force" that Newton and Einstein theorized it to be. He thinks it is the result of patterns of complex, microscopic phenomena.

link:
http://bigthink.com/ideas/22877
 
Physics news on Phys.org

1. What is the concept of "emergent gravity" proposed by Erik Verlinde?

According to Verlinde's theory, gravity is not a fundamental force, but rather an emergent phenomenon that arises from the collective behavior of microscopic particles. It is a consequence of the way information is processed and stored in the universe.

2. How does Verlinde's theory explain the behavior of gravity in the absence of matter?

In Verlinde's theory, gravity arises from the entanglement of information between particles. This means that even in the absence of matter, there is still information and entanglement present, leading to the existence of gravity.

3. Does Verlinde's theory contradict Einstein's theory of general relativity?

Verlinde's theory does not necessarily contradict general relativity, but rather offers a different perspective on how gravity works. It provides a more fundamental understanding of gravity, whereas general relativity is a description of its effects on a large scale.

4. Can Verlinde's theory be tested or proven?

Verlinde's theory is still in its early stages and has not yet been fully tested or proven. However, there are ongoing experiments and observations that may help support or disprove the theory in the future.

5. How does Verlinde's theory impact our current understanding of the universe?

If Verlinde's theory is proven to be accurate, it could greatly impact our understanding of the universe and the laws of physics. It would revolutionize our understanding of gravity and could potentially lead to new developments in cosmology and quantum mechanics.

Similar threads

Emergent Gravity and MOND: A Comparative Analysis
    • New Member Introductions
Replies
1
Views
930
A Erik Verlinde's new view on dark matter
    • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
35
Views
17K
Erik Verlinde video on entropic force gravity
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
8K
Verlinde Gravity: Constructing Gravity From the Ground Up
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
4K
I Rovelli on Quantum Gravity
    • Beyond the Standard Models
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
Gravity as an emergent phenomenon
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
5K
B QFT & QM Questions (about time, locality, gravity, etc.)
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Loop Quantum Gravity and the Concept of the Universe as a Co
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
2K
Admissions Need advice for my personal statement
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
27
Views
2K
AdS/CFT w/out Holography and SLOT - Fluctuation Work Theorem
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
23
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top