Gun with a tachyon bullet paradox

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the theoretical implications of a gun that fires tachyon bullets, which are hypothetical particles that travel faster than light and could potentially allow for time travel. The concept raises paradoxes, particularly the idea that if such a bullet were fired, it could arrive at its origin before it was created, leading to self-inflicted harm. The conversation touches on the nature of tachyons, noting their lack of mass, which differentiates them from conventional projectiles. The discussion also highlights the absence of empirical evidence for tachyons and the paradoxes associated with exceeding the speed of light, referencing the "tachyonic anti-telephone" as a notable example. Additionally, it questions whether there are inherent limits within the closed universe model that could prevent these paradoxes from occurring.
amorphos_b
Messages
34
Reaction score
3
Gun with a tachyon bullet paradox

if you had a device akin to some kind of ‘gun’, which created tachyons and the fired them, perhaps in a beam or some kind of ‘packet’, when they go faster than the speed of light would go back in time. Lets say the ‘bullet’ or beam, went out into the universe and due to the curvature of space, it would eventually arrive at its original point, but before it was launched or even created?

Having no mass the tachyon bullet or beam would not kill you? Although light has no mass but a laser could. if we could go back in time and fire a gun at ourselves, it would kill us before we fired the gun!

Is there an upper limit to time and speed, which would stop such things occurring, and does the closed universe model have limits?

_
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there exist tachyon, which go faster than light, what you say would make a paradox as you expect. But we have not found tachyon yet.
 
There are definitely real paradoxes in relativity if you can exceed the speed of light. The "tachyonic anti-telephone" is a standard one, and doesn't require a closed universe. That it doesn't make sense may be a reason why we've never seen any evidence of it.
 
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...

Similar threads

Back
Top