Help Stop The Internet Blacklist

  • News
  • Thread starter MysticDude
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Internet
In summary: So, for example, if YouTube is blocked, people can still go to youtube.com, but they can't go to yt.com.In summary, the bill proposed by Demand Progress would require the blocking of any website that is "dedicated to infringing activity" that the court or an Attorney General puts on a list. YouTube, which is known for hosting a lot of copyrighted material, would likely be blocked under this bill.
  • #1
MysticDude
Gold Member
142
0
Okay so this is mainly for the people in the United States but people everywhere can help too. Please sign this petition in order to help save the Internet.

So a http://demandprogress.org/blacklist/coica has been proposed that can actually block any site that is "dedicated to infringing activity" that the court or an Attorney General puts on a list(two different lists, one for the court rulings and the other for the Attorneys). Any domain name that is put on the court list is required by the ISPs to be blocked. So YouTube, which has loads of songs that are infringing copyright, can be blocked. ThePirateBay(you know what I'm talking about) will surely be blocked and you can't do anything about it.NOTE: THIS WAS QUICKLY TYPED SO SOME THINGS MIGHT BE INCORRECT.

More about the Bill: http://demandprogress.org/blacklist/coica
The Bill itself: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s111-3804
Petition:http://demandprogress.org/blacklist/?source=bb

Sorry if there is already another thread like this.
This isn't a world affair, but since it involves the govt. I thought it would fit here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Reading over the text of the bill, I'm not so sure that Youtube qualifies as an "infringing website:"

(A) primarily designed, has no demonstrable, commercially significant purpose or use other than, or is marketed by its operator, or by a person acting in concert with the operator, to offer:

(i) goods or services in violation of title 17, United States Code, or enable or facilitate a violation of title 17, United States Code, including by offering or providing access to, without the authorization of the copyright owner or otherwise by operation of law, copies of, or public performance or display of, works protected by title 17, in complete or substantially complete form, by any means, including by means of download, transmission, or otherwise, including the provision of a link or aggregated links to other sites or Internet resources for obtaining such copies for accessing such performance or displays; or

(ii) to sell or distribute goods, services, or materials bearing a counterfeit mark, as that term is defined in section 34(d) of the Act entitled ‘An Act to provide for the registration and protection of trademarks used in commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain international conventions, and for other purposes’, approved July 5, 1946 (commonly referred to as the ‘Trademark Act of 1946’ or the ‘Lanham Act’; 15 U.S.C. 1116(d)); and

(B) engaged in the activities described in subparagraph (A), and when taken together, such activities are central to the activity of the Internet site or sites accessed through a specific domain name.[2]
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s111-3804
 
  • #3
Newai said:
Reading over the text of the bill, I'm not so sure that Youtube qualifies as an "infringing website:"


http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s111-3804
Maybe YouTube was a bad example, but what about RapidShare, MegaUpload, and 4Shared. I've gotten my fair share of music from those sites. I've gotten some Android applications that I should have paid for from 4Shared, so those sites might as well be lost too. I don't want those sites to go. To some people they see this as a good thing, but the Internet is the only free place that I know.
 
  • #4
I think a person could have reason to worry that it would qualify under 2324a 2 A (i) as "enable or facilitate", even if they might not believe that it should.

Also relevant is Australia's blacklist, which while much narower in ostensible focus was used for general censorship purposes beyond that allowed by statute, see e.g.:
http://www.uberreview.com/2009/03/w...-internet-blacklist-says-about-censorship.htm
 
  • #5
MysticDude said:
Maybe YouTube was a bad example, but what about RapidShare, MegaUpload, and 4Shared. I've gotten my fair share of music from those sites. I've gotten some Android applications that I should have paid for from 4Shared, so those sites might as well be lost too. I don't want those sites to go. To some people they see this as a good thing, but the Internet is the only free place that I know.
I don't see file hosts as qualifying, either. But there are many, many forums and hosts that don't just offer file hosting; they encourage the sharing of cracked software and other pirated media.

BTW, the library is almost a free place. I paid fifty cents for a card.

MysticDude said:
Maybe YouTube was a bad example
It's an example from one of the links you posted.
 
  • #6
Once a site appears on the list, how long will it take owner to change its name and URL? It seems to me that this bill will do little more than perpetuate a game of cat and mouse.
 
  • #7
skeptic2 said:
Once a site appears on the list, how long will it take owner to change its name and URL? It seems to me that this bill will do little more than perpetuate a game of cat and mouse.

The only thing is that, it's not blocking IPs, the bill is blocking domain names. And to answer your question with another question, how will that person tell his/her visitors about the new site? I understand what you are saying though, and considering that the blacklist is public, this will most likely be like Tom and Jerry, where Jerry is the domain and Tom is the court :D
 
  • #8
I enjoy stealing stuff online as much as the next person, but I think I'll find a way to live without it
 
  • #9
Office_Shredder said:
I enjoy stealing stuff online as much as the next person, but I think I'll find a way to live without it

What if this gets out of hand the court starts to block sites that go against the US, or things that the US just doesn't want the public to know about? Then what?
 
  • #10
MysticDude said:
What if this gets out of hand the court starts to block sites that go against the US, or things that the US just doesn't want the public to know about? Then what?
Didn't they already try that with the Afghan Diary?
 
  • #11
Violating copyrights, illegal downloads, offering cracked software is ILLEGAL and VIOLATES Physics Forums guidelines.

From our guidelines

Copyright Guidelines:
Copyright infringement is illegal. Physics Forums will enforce the law. Never post an article in its entirety. When posting copyrighted material, please use small sections or link to the article. When posting copyrighted material please give credit to the author in your post.

Solicitations for copyrighted materials of any form will not be permitted. Advertisement of locations where copyrighted materials may be obtained will not be permitted.

DO NOT ask for or post links to sites offering these services.
 

1. What is the "Help Stop The Internet Blacklist" campaign all about?

The "Help Stop The Internet Blacklist" campaign is an initiative to raise awareness and advocate against the use of internet blacklists by governments and corporations. These blacklists are used to censor online content and restrict access to certain websites, often in the name of protecting national security or intellectual property rights.

2. How do internet blacklists affect internet users?

Internet blacklists can have a significant impact on internet users by limiting their access to information and infringing on their digital rights. Users may find that certain websites they visit are blocked or that their online activities are monitored and censored.

3. Who is behind the "Help Stop The Internet Blacklist" campaign?

The campaign is led by a diverse group of individuals and organizations, including privacy advocates, digital rights activists, and internet companies. We are united in our belief that internet blacklists are a threat to free speech and an open internet.

4. What can I do to support the campaign and help stop internet blacklists?

There are several ways you can support the campaign. You can spread awareness by sharing information about internet blacklists and the campaign on social media. You can also join or donate to organizations that are actively fighting against internet blacklists. Additionally, you can contact your government representatives and voice your opposition to the use of internet blacklists.

5. Are there any alternatives to using internet blacklists for censorship?

Yes, there are alternative methods for addressing online content that is deemed harmful or illegal. These include using legal processes to remove specific content, implementing parental controls, and promoting digital literacy and responsible internet use. These alternatives are more targeted and less intrusive than internet blacklists.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • Feedback and Announcements
3
Replies
96
Views
41K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
2
Replies
48
Views
21K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • STEM Career Guidance
3
Replies
80
Views
64K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top