Help with rolling cars -- science project

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a science project where a child rolls toy cars down a hill, measuring time and distance traveled. The results show both cars took the same time to reach the bottom, but the heavier car traveled farther on the flat surface. This is explained by the concept of kinetic energy, where the heavier car has greater momentum and energy, allowing it to cover more distance despite having the same acceleration as the lighter car. The conversation also references a famous experiment by an astronaut demonstrating that objects with different weights can hit the ground simultaneously, emphasizing the role of kinetic energy. Overall, the findings align with basic physics principles regarding mass, acceleration, and energy.
Praline
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm sure this is elementary for this forum, but can someone help me figure out if my son's science fair project results are correct? He rolled his toy car, with and without weight added, down hill and measured the time to get to the bottom of the hill and the distance traveled once the car hit the flat part of the track. He kept bumping into the track and messing it up so I'm not sure if his results are accurate. He has both cars traveling down hill in the same amount of time and the heavier car traveling farther. Does that sound right? How would you explain it in elementary age terms? Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Praline said:
He has both cars traveling down hill in the same amount of time and the heavier car traveling farther. Does that sound right? How would you explain it in elementary age terms? Thank you in advance.

his both cars are traveling taking same amount of time it means the cars had same accelerations
so if net force experienced by cars were say F(L) and F(H) were such that

F(L)/M(L) = F(H)/M(H) = acceleration
so their velocities after traversing the ramp -touching the flat surface must be same-
but you are saying that they traveled different distances on flat surface...
there is a catch - on coming down their kinetic energy must be different the heavier one having larger kinetic energy and momentum than the lighter one ;
therfore the heavy one gets to stop after traversing larger distance (taking the frictional forces to be same.)
this is just my guess- may be some one can enrich us.
 
  • Like
Likes Praline
drvrm said:
his both cars are traveling taking same amount of time it means the cars had same accelerations
so if net force experienced by cars were say F(L) and F(H) were such that

F(L)/M(L) = F(H)/M(H) = acceleration
so their velocities after traversing the ramp -touching the flat surface must be same-
but you are saying that they traveled different distances on flat surface...
there is a catch - on coming down their kinetic energy must be different the heavier one having larger kinetic energy and momentum than the lighter one ;
therfore the heavy one gets to stop after traversing larger distance (taking the frictional forces to be same.)
this is just my guess- may be some one can enrich us.
Thank you! That is so helpful!
 
See video of the Apollo astronaught dropping a feather and hammer on the moon. Both hit the ground at the same time but the hammer has more KE.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top