Help with these rocket launch questions please

In summary: This approach hinges on the meaning of this:Assume the propellant is burned very quickly at blastoff.Can you see why? What simplifying assumptions have we made in setting up the two equations, based on this?We know a distance covered and an elapsed time. That means that we can compute an average velocity.We know that acceleration is constant. That... means that we can use the average velocity to solve for the initial velocity.
  • #1
takelight2
12
1
Homework Statement
A toy rocket moving vertically upward passes by a 2.2 m -high window whose sill is 9.0 m above the ground. The rocket takes 0.17 s to travel the 2.2 m height of the window.

1. What was the launch speed of the rocket? Assume the propellant is burned very quickly at blastoff.

2. How high will the rocket go?
Relevant Equations
SUVAT equations.
I know that a=-9.8, I am having trouble aplying the motion equations.

For example, I can't use equations that have velocity (either initial or final), so I can rule out those equations. I am then left with no equations to use. I am extremely stumped.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
takelight2 said:
The rocket takes 0.17 s to travel the 2.2 m height of the window.

Is this saying that it took 0.17s to get to the window? Or is it saying that the window has a height of 2.2 m (i.e. bottom is 9 m off the ground and top is 11.2 m above the ground) and it took 0.17 s to get from bottom of window to top of window?

I only ask as I have seen problems that use the latter before

[EDIT]: I have re-read the problem and it looks like it is the latter?
 
  • #3
takelight2 said:
Homework Statement:: A toy rocket moving vertically upward passes by a 2.2 m -high window whose sill is 9.0 m above the ground. The rocket takes 0.17 s to travel the 2.2 m height of the window.
1. What was the launch speed of the rocket? Assume the propellant is burned very quickly at blastoff.

I know that a=-9.8, I am having trouble aplying the motion equations.

Okay good, so you know ## a ## and we also have ## u ##, ## v ##, ## t ## and ## s ## which are unknown. For the first part, you have too many unknowns to get any information from a single equation, but what if you set up a system of equations with multiple unknowns that could be used to solve for some of those points.

Can we set up 2 equations to solve for the time at which the window is reached ## t ## and the initial speed ## u ##?

Can use ## s = ut + \frac{1}{2}at^2 ## at the bottom and the top of the window to form those system of equations? We know ## s ## at the top and the bottom. We know ## a ##.

We know that the time ## t_{top} = t_{bottom} + 0.17 ##

Hope that is of some help
 
  • #4
Master1022 said:
Is this saying that it took 0.17s to get to the window? Or is it saying that the window has a height of 2.2 m (i.e. bottom is 9 m off the ground and top is 11.2 m above the ground) and it took 0.17 s to get from bottom of window to top of window?

I only ask as I have seen problems that use the latter before

[EDIT]: I have re-read the problem and it looks like it is the latter?
Yup its the latter.
 
  • Like
Likes Master1022
  • #5
takelight2 said:
Yup its the latter.

Thanks for the clarification. Then you can set up a system of equations (as suggested in the above post).

Hope that provides a starting point. If not, will be happy to clarify.
 
  • #6
Master1022 said:
Okay good, so you know ## a ## and we also have ## u ##, ## v ##, ## t ## and ## s ## which are unknown. For the first part, you have too many unknowns to get any information from a single equation, but what if you set up a system of equations with multiple unknowns that could be used to solve for some of those points.

Can we set up 2 equations to solve for the time at which the window is reached ## t ## and the initial speed ## u ##?

Can use ## s = ut + \frac{1}{2}at^2 ## at the bottom and the top of the window to form those system of equations? We know ## s ## at the top and the bottom. We know ## a ##.

We know that the time ## t_{top} = t_{bottom} + 0.17 ##

Hope that is of some help

Thanks for the help. I tried the things you said, and ended with the following system of equations:

## 9 = ut + \frac{1}{2}(-9.8)t^2 ##

## 11.2 = u(t+0.17) + \frac{1}{2}(-9.8)(t+0.17)^2 ##

Now, I don't really find a way to solve this system, and it seems to be overly complicated? Am I doing something wrong??
 
  • #7
You are on the right track. Some messy algebra will let you solve for initial velocity u and time t. I kept it symbolic until the end (I used g rather than 9.81 and δ for 0.17) .
 
  • #8
gmax137 said:
You are on the right track. Some messy algebra will let you solve for initial velocity u and time t. I kept it symbolic until the end (I used g rather than 9.81 and δ for 0.17) .
It would be -9.8 right? since its opposite the direction of motion..?
 
  • #9
takelight2 said:
It would be -9.8 right? since its opposite the direction of motion..?
Yes - I think @gmax137 was just referring to magnitude.

takelight2 said:
## 9 = ut + \frac{1}{2}(-9.8)t^2 ##

## 11.2 = u(t+0.17) + \frac{1}{2}(-9.8)(t+0.17)^2 ##

Now, I don't really find a way to solve this system, and it seems to be overly complicated? Am I doing something wrong??

As mentioned above, this looks correct (and working algebraically might help to prevent any numerical errors along the way). Now you have a two equations with two unknowns. Can you find a way to eliminate a variable from either equation?
 
  • #10
takelight2 said:
would be -9.8 right? since its opposite the direction of motion..?
Master1022 said:
Yes - I think @gmax137 was just referring to magnitude.
Yes - Sorry for the confusion.

Were you able to solve the two equations to find the initial velocity?

This approach hinges on the meaning of this:
Assume the propellant is burned very quickly at blastoff.
Can you see why? What simplifying assumptions have we made in setting up the two equations, based on this?
 
  • #11
There is an easier approach which does not involve simultaneous equations.

We know a distance covered and an elapsed time. That means that we can compute an average velocity.

We know that acceleration is constant. That means that the average velocity is also the velocity halfway through the interval. That is enough information to determine the starting and ending velocities from there.
 
  • #12
jbriggs444 said:
There is an easier approach which does not involve simultaneous equations.

We know a distance covered and an elapsed time. That means that we can compute an average velocity.

We know that acceleration is constant. That means that the average velocity is also the velocity halfway through the interval. That is enough information to determine the starting and ending velocities from there.
I will have to try working it through that way. I'm not so sure.
 

1. What is the purpose of a rocket launch?

The purpose of a rocket launch is to propel a spacecraft or satellite into space. This allows for exploration, communication, and research beyond Earth's atmosphere.

2. How does a rocket launch work?

A rocket launch works by using powerful engines to create thrust, which propels the rocket upwards. The rocket also carries fuel and oxidizer, which are ignited to create the necessary energy for liftoff.

3. What factors determine the success of a rocket launch?

The success of a rocket launch depends on various factors, such as the design and construction of the rocket, the accuracy of the launch trajectory, and the functionality of the engines and other components. Weather conditions and external factors can also impact the success of a launch.

4. What is the difference between a rocket launch and a space shuttle launch?

A rocket launch typically refers to the launch of a spacecraft or satellite using a rocket, while a space shuttle launch specifically refers to the launch of a space shuttle, which is a reusable spacecraft used for human spaceflight missions.

5. How do scientists and engineers ensure the safety of a rocket launch?

Scientists and engineers ensure the safety of a rocket launch through extensive testing, simulations, and thorough inspections of all components. They also closely monitor weather conditions and have contingency plans in place in case of any issues during the launch process.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
235
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
391
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
942
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
793
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
183
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
53
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
Back
Top