High strain rate testing using the SHPB -- Help please

AI Thread Summary
A mechanical engineering student is seeking advice on high strain-rate testing of a glass-filled composite using a split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) experiment. The student's results indicate a Young's modulus significantly lower than the expected 5-6 GPa, despite using a program that previously yielded accurate results for other materials. The inputs for the experiment, including the elastic wave speed and modulus of elasticity, have been verified, but varying the Young's modulus has shown little effect on the results. There is a request for insights into potential reasons for the discrepancy, particularly regarding the suitability of the test setup for softer materials. The discussion highlights the importance of accurate data interpretation and the challenges faced in experimental mechanics.
Ben_P_1992
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
I am a part C mechanical engineering student and require some advice for my individual project, which is based on the high strain-rate testing of a particular glass filled composite material using a split-Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) experiment.

I gathered the results on a SHPB test rig and have external data which is being used for comparative analysis to verify my results, however the Young's modulus of the material seems to be way off (It should be about 5-6GPa!) I was hoping somebody had some experience with this experiment or had any ideas as to why this has occurred? Please see the graph below- the gradient of my results should match that of the two curves labelled Finland Test.

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/upload_2015-5-2_21-31-21-png.82985/

The data used was gathered from strain gauges mounted on the maraging steel 250 pressure bars. The measured voltage and time was then manipulated with a program (this program has been used in previous experiments and outputted matching results for different materials.) The only inputs required for this program is the elastic wave speed of the pressure bars and their modulus of elasticity as well as the specimen dimensions pre-testing. I am confident that these inputs are correct, and have even played about with the inputs for both (varied the Young's modulus from 160GPa to 220GPa in 10GPa intervals) to see how the Young's modulus is affected, but there is little effect. Please see the graph below:

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/upload_2015-5-2_21-37-34-png.82986/

I am very stuck and am not quite sure how to explain why this happening. Any help or advice would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

Ben
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hey Ben, sorry I'm afraid I won't be of much help as I haven't made it as far as you, but I just wanted to let you know your pictures are not coming up. Just letting you know so you can fix it so someone who can help you will be able to.
 
Thanks for the heads up. The pictures are attached here.https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/upload_2015-5-2_21-31-21-png.82985/
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/upload_2015-5-2_21-37-34-png.82986/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your images are still broken.
You say that this test setup has been successfully used before, but were those previous materials as soft as yours?
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top