Hinged door lowering below the horizontal

  • Thread starter Ghrober
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Horizontal
In summary, the conversation is about a 2015 kg ramp hinged at one end and lowered by cables through a sheave. The anchor point on the ramp is 2.7m from the hinge and the overall length is 3.3m. The person is looking for help in calculating the force needed to lift the ramp at varying angles and has provided information and a spreadsheet with a formula that does not work. They also mention the use of a torque limiter and question the accuracy of their calculations.
  • #1
Ghrober
9
0
Hi all, This is not a homework question it is trying to get brownie points from my boss.
I have a ramp (mass 2015kg of uniform size) hinged at one end lowered by cables (2) through a sheave 2.7m Vertical. The anchor point on the ramp is 2.7m from the hinge. The overall length of the ramp is 3.3m
What I would like to know is what force is required to lift the door at varying angles?
I have put the information below into a spreadsheet so I can just change (a) thinking it would calculate the force on any angle I entered.
What I know does not work is the formula for C. I have tested the formula against pythag theory(with a =90 degrees) and the length of cable(C) is not the same. Also at angles above 90 degrees the cable length gets shorter?

T=W*L*C/(2*A*B)
W=weight of Door (N)(ton*9.1) 18336.5
L=distance to mass centre of flap(m) 2.6
A=height of cable top from hinge(m) 2.7
B=distance from hinge to anchor on door(m) 2.7
upload_2015-1-8_20-37-50.png

C=Length of cable
4.235063
a= angle of open flap to vertical 110
T= 13.8481617 Kn
1.52177601 Te

Any help would be greatly appreciated
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think you'll have to provide a diagram to get good advice.

My interpretation:

There is a 2015 kg ramp of uniform density, 3.3 m long, and hinged at one end. The ramp is raised a lowered by two cables. The cables are attached to opposite sides of the (3.3 m long) edge of the ramp a points 2.7 m from the hinge. Each cable goes over a pulley that is at a vertical distance of 2.7 m [above the level of the hinge?]. The cables are exactly vertical [when the ramp is in an exactly horizontal position? - or when the ramp is lowered so it makes an angle of 110 deg with the upward vertical?].

Find the tension on each cable as a function of the angle the ramp makes [with the upward vertical?].
 
  • #3
Stephen Tashi said:
I think you'll have to provide a diagram to get good advice.

My interpretation:

There is a 2015 kg ramp of uniform density, 3.3 m long, and hinged at one end. The ramp is raised a lowered by two cables. The cables are attached to opposite sides of the (3.3 m long) edge of the ramp a points 2.7 m from the hinge. Each cable goes over a pulley that is at a vertical distance of 2.7 m [above the level of the hinge?]. The cables are exactly vertical [when the ramp is in an exactly horizontal position? - or when the ramp is lowered so it makes an angle of 110 deg with the upward vertical?].

Find the tension on each cable as a function of the angle the ramp makes [with the upward vertical?].
I'll try to send a picture shortly,
But you got most of it. The pulley is 2.7m vertical from the hinge, the cables are never vertical. They form an angle of approx 45 degrees when the ramp is horizontal . The ramp can be lowered approx to 120 degrees from the vertical. I would like to know the tension at any given angle(if possible)
 
  • #4
here is a picture not great but you should get the gist
 

Attachments

  • Ramp door.jpg
    Ramp door.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 992
  • #5
Your formula for the length of the cable is correct.

My first draft is:

Let [itex] \theta = 90 - \alpha [/itex] (degrees) which is the angle of the ramp below the horizontal
Let [itex] \beta [/itex] be the angle of the cable below the horizontal.

[itex] \beta = \arctan( \frac{A + B \sin(\theta)}{B \cos(\theta) } [/itex]

[itex](B \cos(\theta)) [(2T)( \sin(\beta) )] = (L \cos(\theta) ) W [/itex]

[itex] 2T \sin(\beta) B = LW [/itex]

[itex] T = \frac{LW}{ \sin(\beta) B } [/itex]

I'll think more about this later. I have to leave now.
 
  • #6
Second draft:

Let [itex] \theta = \alpha - 90 [/itex] (degrees) which is the angle of the ramp below the horizontal
Let [itex] \beta [/itex] be the angle of the cable below the horizontal.

[itex] \beta = \arctan( \frac{A + B \sin(\theta)}{B \cos(\theta) } [/itex]

[itex](B \cos(\theta)) [(2T)( \sin(\beta) )] = (L \cos(\theta) ) W [/itex]

[itex] 2T \sin(\beta) B = LW [/itex]

[itex] T = \frac{LW}{ 2 \sin(\beta) B } [/itex]
 
  • #7
I don't like that design. The hinge location appears illogical. I know that is not helpful, but, it is curious.
 
  • Like
Likes dragoneyes001
  • #8
Thanks Stephen for all your work.

Chronos,
The ramp is on a boat the cables are raised and lowered by electric motors to allow cargo to be driven on and off the vessel. When the ramp is closed to provides a weather proof door.
 
  • #9
Keep in mind that the theoretical calculation can differ from the real life situation. The theoreical calculation assumes the cables are perfectly adjusted so they bear equal weight. The theoretical calculation is for a tension that is necessary to "levitate" the gate at a given angle. To actually raise or lower the gate, it would move with some accelerations, which require additional forces.
 
  • #10
Thanks for your comments. I understand what your saying. I was hoping to use the information to confirm that the WLL of the cables are sufficient to raise the door. The winches are also fitted with torque limiters(clutches) that are designed to stop over tensioning of the cables, but still alow the door to be lifted on one cable in the event of a cable/motor failure. I guess the only true way of testing would be to put a load cell on the cable and lift the door?
 
  • #11
hi all further to my initial post I have done a calculation using the ramp lowered at a angle of 110 degrees from the vertical using Stephen's formula and the ramp dimensions I supplied and have come up with an answer of 61.101Kn is this correct? if so is this a combined force required over the 2 cables to keep the ramp in levitation ( as Stephen mentioned in his last post). I guess what I really want to know is do I need to divide this by 2 (for each cable) or is it already factored into the equation? THIS IS REALLY OUT OF MY LEAGUE :headbang:
Thanks Glenn
 
  • #12
Use my second draft. You get the tension on a single cable. I'll get around to checking you numerical answer later.

Some things need to be clarified. You said the ramp is of uniform construction and 3.3 m long, but the distance from the hinge to the center of mass is 2.6 m? If the ramp was uniform, I'd expected the mass center to be halfway from the hinge to the end of the ramp.

The diagram gives the mass of the ramp as 2015 kg. In your first post you show some other numbers for W. Is the correct weight of the ramp (2015 kg)(9.8 Newtons) = 19747.0 Newtons ?
 
  • #13
I told a little fib the ramp is not completely uniform but it is 3.3m long. I used the figure of 2.6M as a bit of a guess.
To give you the background, this ramp already has been built and is working on a vessel. It is fitted with 2 x11mm SWR with a WLL 2.3t (min breaking force/5(safety factor)/9.81(convert to ton)-5% (derated due to fittings) and has a history of breaking cables. There are ships drawings that show the ramps fitted with 16mm SWR cables and 11mm cables and I am not sure what cables should be used. Using your formula I was hoping to show, or not show,that the angle of the ramp is exceeding, or not, the WLL of the cables. When I mentioned my concerns to my supervisor he told me that "they already knew that the cables were sufficient to lift the ramp in a straight lift" and believe the issue could be the MBR of the SWR around the sheaves. I don't, so am trying to prove it.

I don't believe the angle of the cables/ramp has ever been taken into consideration. I don't think I'm going to get any arguments from the vessel owners If I say the centre of mass is 2.6 or 1.7m aft of the hinge, but thankyou for being very precise.

The weight of the ramp is 2015kg. That was my mistake I missed the 8 in the tenths column. Should read 2015kg *9.81. I had the data set up in an excel document and it was auto calculating it hence the incorrect mass. It should read as you have stated above 19747n.

Sorry if this all sounds like a rant. I just wanted to give you a bit more of the picture as to what I am using the information for.

Glenn
 
  • #14
outrigger_zps5ccf6b51.jpg
60 degrees beyond vertical would be a problem with that design. because the lifting cable comes too close to in line with the ramp your lifting power will become almost zero.

usually to avoid this especially on boats the pulleys are on top of outrigger posts that also swing outward increasing the angle so the lifting force is maintained
 
Last edited:
  • #15
:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin: I think I've got it. After much studying Stephens formula I have come up with 2.4189T/cable with the ramp @110 Degrees from vertical.
W=weight of Door (N)(ton*9.81) 19767.15
L=distance to mass centre of flap(m) 2.6
A=height of cable top from hinge(m) 2.7
B=distance from hinge to anchor on door(m) 2.7
a= angle of open flap to vertical 110
β=a-90
T=LW/2sin(β)B

T=2.6*19767.15/2*sin(20)*2.7
T= 23730.2798N/1000
T=23.730Kn/9.81
T=2.418ton
A confirmation this is right would be much appreciated
 
  • #16
Ghrober said:
using the ramp lowered at a angle of 110 degrees from the vertical using Stephen's formula and the ramp dimensions I supplied and have come up with an answer of 61.101Kn is this correct?

I get a different tension.

From the c-program
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>

#define A (2.7) /* pulley height in meters */
#define B (2.7) /* hinge to anchor in meters */
#define L (2.6) /* hinge to center of mass in meters */
#define W ((2015.0)*(9.8) ) /* weight of ramp in Newtons */

#define CONV_TO_RADIANS ( M_PI/180.0)
#define CONV_TO_DEGREES ( 180.0/ M_PI )
#define PI_OVER_TWO (M_PI/2.0)

void main()

{double theta, beta;
double theta_rad, beta_rad;
double alpha;
double alpha_rad;
double tension;

alpha = 110.0;

printf("A = %6.3f B = %6.3f L = %6.3f W = %6.3f alpha = %6.3f deg\n",A,B,L,W,alpha);

theta = alpha - 90.0;

printf("theta = %6.3f deg\n",theta);

theta_rad = theta * CONV_TO_RADIANS;

printf("theta_rad = %7.4f radians\n",theta_rad);

printf("A + B*sin(theta_rad)= %6.3f\n",A + B*sin(theta_rad));
printf("B * cos(theta_rad) = %6.3f\n", B * cos(theta_rad));

beta_rad = atan( (A + B*sin(theta_rad))/(B * cos(theta_rad)));
printf("beta_rad = %7.4f radians = %6.3f deg\n", beta_rad, beta_rad * CONV_TO_DEGREES);

printf("L*W = %6.3f\n", L*W);
printf("2.0 * sin(beta_rad)* B = %6.3f\n", 2.0 * sin(beta_rad) *B);

tension = L*W/ (2.0 * sin(beta_rad) * B);

printf("tension = %7.3f Newtons\n", tension);

}

I get the output

A = 2.700 B = 2.700 L = 2.600 W = 19747.000 alpha = 110.000 deg
theta = 20.000 deg
theta_rad = 0.3491 radians
A + B*sin(theta_rad)= 3.623
B * cos(theta_rad) = 2.537
beta_rad = 0.9599 radians = 55.000 deg
L*W = 51342.200
2.0 * sin(beta_rad)* B = 4.423
tension = 11606.899 Newtons

See if we agree on the intermediate steps.
 
  • #17
Ghrober said:
:biggrin::biggrin::biggrin: I think I've got it. After much studying Stephens formula I have come up with 2.4189T/cable with the ramp @110 Degrees from vertical.
W=weight of Door (N)(ton*9.81) 19767.15
L=distance to mass centre of flap(m) 2.6
A=height of cable top from hinge(m) 2.7
B=distance from hinge to anchor on door(m) 2.7
a= angle of open flap to vertical 110
β=a-90
T=LW/2sin(β)B

T=2.6*19767.15/2*sin(20)*2.7
T= 23730.2798N/1000
T=23.730Kn/9.81
T=2.418ton
A confirmation this is right would be much appreciated
am i reading this right?
the door weighs 9.81 tons at 110dgs from vertical and your single cable tension is 2.418 tons? to me that doesn't sound correct.
 
  • #18
ok Stephen I think I got it now. I need to convert the degrees into radians. Thanks a lot for your help and patience. I will need to go away and study trig to really understand the relationships. The end figure of 1.18T (11607Newtons/1000/9.81) was a lot less than I expected.

Dragoneyes
The weight is 2015kg perhaps the definition of W should of been written better in my description. The conversion to Newtons is correct though.
 

Related to Hinged door lowering below the horizontal

1. How does a hinged door lower below the horizontal?

A hinged door is able to lower below the horizontal due to the placement and design of its hinges. The hinges are typically attached to the door frame and allow the door to pivot and move up or down.

2. What causes a hinged door to lower below the horizontal?

A hinged door may lower below the horizontal due to a few reasons. One common cause is that the hinges are worn or damaged, causing the door to droop or sag. Another cause could be that the door is too heavy for the hinges to support, leading to the door lowering over time.

3. Can a hinged door be prevented from lowering below the horizontal?

Yes, there are a few ways to prevent a hinged door from lowering below the horizontal. Regular maintenance and lubrication of the hinges can help prevent wear and tear. Additionally, using lighter materials for the door or installing additional support for the hinges can also prevent the door from lowering.

4. Is it dangerous if a hinged door lowers below the horizontal?

A hinged door lowering below the horizontal can pose a danger if it is not addressed. It can lead to difficulty in opening and closing the door, as well as potential injuries if the door falls or swings shut unexpectedly. It is important to address any issues with a hinged door lowering below the horizontal to ensure safety.

5. Can a hinged door that has lowered below the horizontal be fixed?

In most cases, a hinged door that has lowered below the horizontal can be fixed. This may involve replacing worn or damaged hinges, adjusting the placement of the hinges, or adding additional support. It is best to consult a professional for any repairs or replacements needed to ensure the door is fixed safely and effectively.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
3
Replies
88
Views
21K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
31
Views
10K
Back
Top