MHB Hoax paper published in some journal... hilarious

  • Thread starter Thread starter caffeinemachine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Journal Paper
AI Thread Summary
A software called Mathgen has generated a math paper that was accepted for publication in a journal, sparking discussions about its authenticity and implications. The paper, which can be accessed via a provided link, is noted for its originality and interesting results, potentially inspiring further research. It is described as well-written and adequately referenced, suggesting it meets academic standards. The discussion highlights the humorous aspect of a computer-generated paper being taken seriously, with a recommendation for its acceptance in the Journal for Algebra and Number Theory, indicating possible embarrassment within the peer review process.
caffeinemachine
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
799
Reaction score
15
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: hoax paper published in some journal.. hilarious

I have gone through the paper. It is a good paper. In my view the results obtained are original, new and interesting. This paper may trigger further research in the direction of work.

Clarity: This paper is well-written and well-presented.

Literature: The authors’ references to the literature seem adequate.

Interest: Readers of the journal will find this paper interesting.

Recommendation: I recommend that this paper be accepted for publication in the Journal for Algebra and Number Theory Academia.
 
I image there are a few red faces in the Peer Review department. :mad:

-Dan
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top