How can we know how many solutions an equation has?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Juwane
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine how many solutions an equation has, one can analyze the function's behavior and continuity. The equation provided can be transformed into a quadratic form, allowing for the identification of intersections with the x-axis. By evaluating the function at specific points, it can be established that there are two intersections based on the changes in sign. The denominator does not affect the number of solutions since the equation is zero only when the numerator is zero. Thus, the number of solutions is determined solely by the roots of the transformed function.
Juwane
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
I have this equation:

\frac{x+2}{x^2+3}-0.3

I don't want to solve it, but I have drawn it's graph on a graph program, and there is a line that is little below the x-axis; and when I scroll to the left of the graph, it seems that at more negative values the line is getting higher and higher.

My question is that how can I know whether it will touch the x-axis or not. In other words, how can I know how many solutions there are to this function?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To say that the function touches the x-axis is another way of stating that for some x-value the resulting value will be 0 (i.e. the y-value is 0). Thus what you want to do is determine whether:
\frac{x+2}{x^2+3}-0.3 =0
Consider the function:
f(x) = \frac{10x+20}{x^2+3} - 3
This is just your equation scaled by a factor 10 to make the number easier to work with. Clearly scaling won't change the number of intersections with the x-axis. Now note,
f(-2) = -3 < 0
f(0) = 11/3 > 0
f(8) = -101/67 < 0
and since f is continuous it must intersect the x-axis between -2 and 0 (when going from negative to positive), and again between 0 and 8 (when going from positive to negative).

To see that these are the only solutions just rewrite f(x) as:
f(x) =\frac{10x+20}{x^2+3} - 3\frac{x^2+3}{x^2+3} = \frac{-3x^2 + 10x + 11}{x^2+3}
so f(x) =0 precisely when
-3x^2+10x+11=0
but a quadratic function intersects the x-axis at most twice, and we have found two intersections so precisely twice. Alternatively you could just have found this quadratic function and computed the discriminant and noted that it was positive.
 
rasmhop said:
To see that these are the only solutions just rewrite f(x) as:
f(x) =\frac{10x+20}{x^2+3} - 3\frac{x^2+3}{x^2+3} = \frac{-3x^2 + 10x + 11}{x^2+3}
so f(x) =0 precisely when
-3x^2+10x+11=0
but a quadratic function intersects the x-axis at most twice, and we have found two intersections so precisely twice. Alternatively you could just have found this quadratic function and computed the discriminant and noted that it was positive.

I understand that a quadratic function intersects the x-axis at most twice, but what the denominator of \frac{-3x^2 + 10x + 11}{x^2+3}? Surely that denominator changes the degree of the equation and hence the number of solutions?
 
Juwane said:
I understand that a quadratic function intersects the x-axis at most twice, but what the denominator of \frac{-3x^2 + 10x + 11}{x^2+3}? Surely that denominator changes the degree of the equation and hence the number of solutions?

Actually it doesn't change the number of solutions because a/b = 0 if and only if a=0 (to see this just multiply by b to get a=0b=0). Thus if we have,
h(x) = \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} \qquad g(x) \not= 0
Then h(x)=0 if and only if f(x)=0.
EDIT: From these observations it follows that the set of roots of h and f are equal, and therefore they have the same number of roots.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top