How Do I Solve Part C of a Low Pass Filter Exam Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving part C of a low pass filter exam problem, with participants sharing their approaches and seeking clarification. Key points include the importance of correctly simplifying the resistor and capacitor in parallel to find the combined impedance and the suggestion to use admittance (Y) instead of impedance (Z) for easier calculations. Participants also discuss the relationship between resistances and capacitances in the context of frequency independence and the transfer function. Additionally, there is a request for guidance on drawing Bode plots, highlighting a lack of clarity in the textbook. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for accurate calculations and understanding of circuit components to solve the problem effectively.
Synops
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Exams are coming up and I've been doing some revision from past papers. Having issues with working out part c of the attached problem. I've already calculated part a and b, possibly correct. Basically I simplified resistances and capacitance. And to have a constant frequency I let Z equal the inverse of the simplified resistance to cancel ω the frequency component. I then used this information to determine a new resistance and capacitance that had no ω component.

Any hints or tips would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • low pass filter.jpg
    low pass filter.jpg
    8.5 KB · Views: 558
Physics news on Phys.org
If you did parts a and b correctly (they're really the same question) then you got R1C1 = R2C2 where 1/Z = G1 + sC1, G1 = 1/R1, and R2 = 1/G2 = 10K and C2 = 1 nF.

Now R1 → 2R1 so what is your new transfer function? And same question when R1 → R1/2. Do you know how to draw Bode plots?

Part 1 c iii does not specify the circuit so can't be answered.
 
Not sure exactly what you meant by your answer to the first two parts.. However the way i calculated it was by simplifying the resistor and capacitor in parallel. This gave me 1x10^4 + 1x10^6/jw. Then I assumed that to remove jw, since Z is now in series with this equivalent resistance, it would have to equal -1x10^6/jw.

For part b. I assumed a resistor of 1Ω in parallel with a capacitor of 0.1x10^-6. Simplifying this to obtain 1x10^6/jw + 1. I assume this answer would be negative as that's how it would cancel if it was added in series. This is the new realized Z which then adds to the result of the previous question which gave a result of 9999Ω. Which has no ω component.

Is this the correct approach?

Also, I'm not sure how to draw a bode plot. I've done them in practical classes with a simulation program called SPICE, however the book doesn't explain how to draw them very well.. Would you mind giving me an overview of the process?
 
Last edited:
Synops said:
Not sure exactly what you meant by your answer to the first two parts.. However the way i calculated it was by simplifying the resistor and capacitor in parallel. This gave me 1x10^4 + 1x10^6/jw.

What do you mean by 'simplifying'? Do you mean determining the combined impedance of the 10K resistor and 1 nF capacitor in parallel? If so, you did that wrong. Y = G + jwC so Z = 1/Y where G = 1/R. The real part of the complex impedance of the 10K and 1 nF is frequency-dependent.

BTW 1 nF = 10^(-9)F, not 10^(-6).

So you don't have the correct network for frequency-independent gain yet.

******************************************************************
In this situation I know from experience that it's much easier to deal in admittance Y, conductance G and susceptance B than impedance Z, resistance R and reactance X. The relations are simple: Y = 1/Z, B = 1/X and G = 1/R. Example: for a capacitor, B = wC and Y = jB.

You'll recall that for parallel-connected components, susceptances are added: so for your R and C, Y = G + jB = G + jwC, G = 1/R.

Given the above, what is Vout/Vin of your diagram if we replace Z with Y = 1/Z?

Also, I'm not sure how to draw a bode plot. I've done them in practical classes with a simulation program called SPICE, however the book doesn't explain how to draw them very well.. Would you mind giving me an overview of the process?

This is much too long a subject for me to discuss here. Look at

http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/mastascu/econtrolhtml/Freq/Freq5.html or

www.dartmouth.edu/~sullivan/22files/Bode_plots.pdf
 
Ok thanks for all your help!

Just to get me back on track, Z is meant to equal Z0 which is: 1/(1x10^(-9)jw + 1/10000)?

I just used the relationships you were describing to find: Y = 1 x 10^(-9)jw + 1/10000

Then to find Impedance: Z = 1/Y, therefore Z = 1/(1x10^(-9)jw + 1/10000)

Is this correct so far?
 
Synops said:
Ok thanks for all your help!

Just to get me back on track, Z is meant to equal Z0 which is: 1/(1x10^(-9)jw + 1/10000)?

I just used the relationships you were describing to find: Y = 1 x 10^(-9)jw + 1/10000

Then to find Impedance: Z = 1/Y, therefore Z = 1/(1x10^(-9)jw + 1/10000)

Is this correct so far?

Fine so far! But forget Z of your network. You'll be dealing with Y's instead.

Also, don't put in numbers yet. Call the 1 nF = C2 and the 10K = R2 = 1/G2.

Now, what is Vout/Vin in terms of this Y2 = G2 + jwC2 and the Y equivalent of the Z as marked on your diagram? Defie Y1 = 1/Z.
 
Thread 'Have I solved this structural engineering equation correctly?'
Hi all, I have a structural engineering book from 1979. I am trying to follow it as best as I can. I have come to a formula that calculates the rotations in radians at the rigid joint that requires an iterative procedure. This equation comes in the form of: $$ x_i = \frac {Q_ih_i + Q_{i+1}h_{i+1}}{4K} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i-1} + \frac {C}{K}x_{i+1} $$ Where: ## Q ## is the horizontal storey shear ## h ## is the storey height ## K = (6G_i + C_i + C_{i+1}) ## ## G = \frac {I_g}{h} ## ## C...
Back
Top