How Do You Solve a Delta T Analysis Problem in Homework?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a Delta T analysis problem in homework, specifically identifying initial and final temperatures. The initial temperature is stated as 24 degrees Celsius, while the final temperature is 29 degrees Celsius, leading to confusion about the Delta T value. It is clarified that the final temperature should be the maximum observed after a reaction, not the temperature measured after cooling. Additionally, complications may arise if the system cools before fully heating, requiring extrapolation to find the maximum temperature, though this is not necessary in the current problem. Understanding the correct definition of final temperature is crucial for accurately solving Delta T problems.
Teemo
Messages
44
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


See Thumbnail.

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I am absolutely floored as how to do this problem.
 

Attachments

  • wat.png
    wat.png
    7.5 KB · Views: 559
Physics news on Phys.org
What was the initial temperature? What was the final temperature?
 
The initial temperature is 24 degrees Celsius and the final temperature is 29 degrees Celsius. However, 5 degrees Celsius as a delta T is not an option given :/
 
Ah, I see where your problems steams from.

Final temperature is not the one measured after the system had time to cool down (actually if you wait long enough final temperature will be the same as the starting one). Final temperature is the one observed after the reaction ended (so it is the maximum temperature observed).

Sometimes things are slightly more complicated, as the systems cools down even before it completely heats up, then, to get the maximum temperature, you may have to extrapolate. But it doesn't look like it is the case here.

1.gif
 
Yes, this is exactly the explanation I found elsewhere! Thank you so much, Borek!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top