- #36
jim hardy
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
- 9,832
- 4,895
early rectifiers were copper oxide... my guess would be a joint in the roof flashing somewhere
Which reminded me of another semiconductor, discovered in, and named after Germany.CWatters said:During WW2 the landlord of a British public house called to police to report hearing "someone speaking German up my chimney". Turned out they weren't far from a BBC transmitter used to broadcast messages to Europe, including some in German. As I heard it the chimney was metal lined and somehow a joint partially rectified the signal causing the transmissions to become audible.
Tremolo is a fair way to describe FM as the carrier frequency is varied by the modulating signal. When the frequency deviation is high the carrier can actually be seen to sweep from side to side when you look with a spectrum analyser . That would be, for instance if you swept the carrier frequency from +10kHZ to -10kHz relative to the steady value (of 100kHz) at a rate of, say 50Hz. But sometimes the frequency deviation is low and the carrier deviation might only be +/-1kHz with a modulation frequency of 2kHz. Then the spectrum of the modulated signal really becomes unrecognisable to the eye. Nonetheless, the system works and a suitable FM demodulator can dig the modulating signal out of the received signal. The Maths of FM is a nightmare compared with AM.musichascolors said:So is tremolo not a good analogy in that case, if the carrier frequency isn't changing in amplitude?
sophiecentaur said:On the whole, though, analogies are not very fruitful and you need to use Maths in order to get a good grip of signalling processes. It is a good thing that AM, at least, can be done in pictures!
I think you mean mixing a signal (frequency shifting) requires a nonlinear element. Demodulation can be done in some cases with a simple linear filter.Baluncore said:To demodulate a signal requires a non-linear electrical junction such as a semiconductor...
There are so many ways of demodulating an FM signal. If you off tune an AM receiver, you can 'slope detect' an fm signal by the AM detector producing an output which is proportional to the carrier frequency over the sloping response of the edge of the IF filter. That is an actual FM demodulator and there are a lot of such designs. Then there is the phase detector - which is what your PLL feedback signal is actually doing. They all have their advantages and disadvantages and the arrival of Integrated Circuits (tarrraaa!) caused a flurry of designs.jim hardy said:So it'll 'de-frequency-modulate' with ease.
How do you demodulate AM or FM with a linear filter?mheslep said:Demodulation can be done in some cases with a simple linear filter.
You will always need an amplitude detector of some sort as well as the linear filter. So you still need a non-linear element.Baluncore said:How do you demodulate AM or FM with a linear filter?
Baluncore said:How do you demodulate AM or FM with a linear filter?
Yes, sorry, a detector is required.sophiecentaur said:You will always need an amplitude detector of some sort as well as the linear filter. So you still need a non-linear element.
sophiecentaur said:Tremolo is a fair way to describe FM as the carrier frequency is varied by the modulating signal.
I think that's an easy one. A 'good grip' means the ability to predict, accurately, what will happen in any particular circumstance. Very hard to do without Maths in pretty well any form of modulation except basic AM.musichascolors said:I guess it depends on what one considers a good grip.
Tremble vs Vibrate ? I'm having a hard time tying one word to pitch and the other to intensity, Is there a memory peg you musical folks use?musichascolors said:Musically speaking, tremolo is when the amplitude is modulated, vibrato is when the pitch is modulated,
None of the above examples of "tremolo" are free of some frequency mod at the same time.musichascolors said:Yeah, they sound similar, which is why they're often used interchangeably, for example, Fender amplifiers often have tremolo switches that are called Vibrato.
But the Monomod software I'm going to try actually labels tremolo as AM and Vibrato as FM, so I'm feeling optimistic.
I think that introducing the AM idea is adding complication. It doesn't strictly involve normal 'AM' because AM would have a carrier and two sidebands. It would be more like suppressed carrier AM and the carrier, if it were there, would be half way between the two tones and would demodulate as a tone of half the beat frequency, I think. The SCDSB signal looks like a 'row of beads' with peaks at twice the frequency of the peaks on the equivalent DSBAM signal.Baluncore said:We hear a beat frequency between them that is actually an AM tone = tremolo
Yep. The tape or disc speed variation - slow or fast - would change the frequency.Merlin3189 said:Do you remember wow and flutter? I think they are FM.
The ear is a remarkable instrument in itself and is aided by quite the pattern recognizing computer.Baluncore said:Is our ear unable to separate the two individual frequencies because they are too close?
http://www.cochlea.eu/en/cochlea/function
The cochlea is capable of exceptional sound analysis, in terms of both frequency and intensity.
The human cochlea allows the perception of sounds between 20 Hz and 20 000 Hz (nearly 10 octaves), with a resolution of 1/230 octave (from 3 Hz at 1000 Hz).
At 1000 Hz, the cochlea encodes acoustic pressures between 0 dB SPL (2 x 10-5 Pa) and 120 dB SPL (20 Pa).
I think that complication is necessary to understand the situation.sophiecentaur said:I think that introducing the AM idea is adding complication.
sophiecentaur said:None of the above examples of "tremolo" are free of some frequency mod at the same time.
A tremolo arm / 'whammy' bar on a guitar stretch the strings so no well justified 'A.M. Only' example for a tremolo.
Yes, it has the sound of varying amplitude but 'modulated by what? I was just being picky at the use of "A.M." which is, to my mind, a special term and not to be used in other contexts if we want to avoid newcomers being confused in their search for understanding of AM radio etc.. When they see the scope trace of two close sine waves (which would appear the same as DSBSCAM - with that grotty phase inversion at the zero crossing) and the real AM signal where the envelope is clearly the same as the modulating signal. One big difference between the two effects is that two beating signals can be produced with two perfectly linear generators whereas AM requires a non linear process in the modulator. There is also the issue of the beat frequency with two tones being at twice the frequency that would correspond to AM (with suppressed carrier).Baluncore said:That sounds to us like AM.
musichascolors said:The rectifier basically converts the signal to DC/a flat line. So obviously alternating the amplitude of DC in the shape of the original signal recreates that signal (since the DC is a straight line). (I know it's actually the opposite order, but I think that's the idea)
And then the low-pass filter just cleans up the noise and distortion (from the DC and AM)
sophiecentaur said:Yes, it has the sound of varying amplitude but 'modulated by what?
I agree with sophiecentaur that the sum of two close tones are strictly not AM.the_emi_guy said:I think what Baluncore is eluding to is that AM can be viewed either as a linear sum or non-linear mixing depending on your point of view.
Baluncore said:I agree with sophiecentaur that the sum of two close tones are strictly not AM.
With three terms, it requires one more precise term be created than is available when adding only two audio tones.the_emi_guy said:[A + Mcos(ωmt)]sin(ωct) = Asin(ωct) + M/2(sin(ωc+ωm)t) + M/2(sin(ωc-ωm)t)
So multiplying the stuff on the LHS produces AM, but adding the stuff on the RHS does not?