How Does String Theory Explain Quark-Gluon Plasma Properties?

In summary, the conversation discusses the AdS/CFT description of gauge theory plasmas and their connection to String theory. The low shear viscosity, jet quenching, and J/psi-suppression are highlighted as major signatures of the quark-gluon plasma observed at RHIC experiments. The concept of spin 2 is explained using the example of two waves traveling in opposite directions, as well as using the moon/earth and tide analogy. The question is posed to experts whether the two examples are equivalent if the two waves stay 180 degrees apart.
  • #1
jal
549
0
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/0701201
String theory and quark-gluon plasma
Authors: Makoto Natsuume
(Submitted on 24 Jan 2007 (v1), last revised 28 Feb 2007 (this version, v2))
Abstract: We review the AdS/CFT description of gauge theory plasmas for non-experts. We discuss the low shear viscosity, jet quenching, and J/psi-suppression, which are three major signatures for the quark-gluon plasma observed at RHIC experiments.
----
Try it!
jal
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In that presentation there is an explanation with the example of two wave traveling in opposite directions to explain of spin 2, gravity.

The following, by Gerard \'t Hooft uses the moon/earth and tide to visualize spin 2.
http://pirsa.org/08040000/
Black Holes and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
========
In order for the two examples to be equivalent then the two waves must stay 180 degrees apart.
My question for the experts: Is that correct?
=======
 
  • #3
String theory and quark-gluon plasma are two theories in physics that help us understand the behavior of particles and matter at a very small scale. In this paper, the author explains how these theories can be used to describe a type of matter called gauge theory plasmas. These plasmas have been observed in experiments at the RHIC, and the author discusses three important properties of them: low shear viscosity, jet quenching, and J/psi-suppression. This information is important for scientists to better understand the behavior of matter at a microscopic level.
 

Related to How Does String Theory Explain Quark-Gluon Plasma Properties?

1. What is an explanation for non-experts?

An explanation for non-experts is a simplified and easy-to-understand description of a complex concept or topic. It is often used by scientists to communicate their research findings to the general public or individuals without a background in the field.

2. Why is it important to provide explanations for non-experts?

It is important to provide explanations for non-experts because it allows for better understanding and engagement with scientific concepts. By breaking down complex ideas into simpler terms, non-experts can grasp the main points and relevance of the topic.

3. How do scientists create explanations for non-experts?

Scientists create explanations for non-experts by using plain language, avoiding jargon, and providing real-life examples to illustrate the concept. They also use analogies and visuals to help non-experts relate to the topic and better understand it.

4. Can explanations for non-experts be inaccurate?

Yes, explanations for non-experts can be inaccurate if the scientist does not fully understand the concept themselves or fails to effectively communicate it. It is important for scientists to thoroughly research and understand the topic before attempting to explain it to non-experts.

5. How can non-experts determine the reliability of an explanation given by a scientist?

Non-experts can determine the reliability of an explanation given by a scientist by considering the source, checking for supporting evidence, and seeking out other sources for comparison. It is also helpful to look for explanations from multiple scientists or experts in the field to get a well-rounded understanding of the topic.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
58
Views
7K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
544
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top