How many Bq equals to 1 Ci?

  • Thread starter Drizzy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Ci
In summary: Radiums is 226 grams. How am I supposed to know this?This is the key you are looking for. It's the amount of radium in a mole.
  • #1
Drizzy
210
1

Homework Statement


1 Curie corresponds to the number of decay in 1 gram radium-226 in 1 second. How many Bequerel is 1 Curie?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Half life: 1600 years

1 gram = 0,001 kg = (0,001/1,660539*10^-27) u
one Radium atom = 226,0260974 u

Number of decays: (0,001/1,660539*10^-27)/226,0260974

Then I thought that since the half-life is so high that the activity won't change much in only 1 second so I though I could pretend that the activity is constant. So I just divided the number of decays with one second but my answer is wrong. In the key that I got from my teacher I am supposed to use this formula: A = lambda * N.

Is it wrong to assume that the activity doesn't change so much in 1 second?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Drizzy said:

Homework Statement


1 Curie corresponds to the number of decay in 1 gram radium-226 in 1 second. How many Bequerel is 1 Curie?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Half life: 1600 years

1 gram = 0,001 kg = (0,001/1,660539*10^-27) u
one Radium atom = 226,0260974 u

Number of decays: (0,001/1,660539*10^-27)/226,0260974

Then I thought that since the half-life is so high that the activity won't change much in only 1 second so I though I could pretend that the activity is constant. So I just divided the number of decays with one second but my answer is wrong. In the key that I got from my teacher I am supposed to use this formula: A = lambda * N.

Is it wrong to assume that the activity doesn't change so much in 1 second?
Possibly.

But I can't figure out your calculations. 1 g of radium 226 contains a certain number of atoms initially. Even figuring a constant decay rate over the HL of this isotope gives you a much closer figure than the one you didn't finish calculating, BTW.

Remember Avogadro!
 
  • #3
okay I will try to explain it. 1 g is 0,001 kg. Then I divided it by1,66 * 10^-27 because I want to convert it from kg to u. And then when I have it in u I took it and divided it by how much one atom weighs so that I know how many atoms there are.

My book uses this method at times.. they say that we pretend that the activity is constant when the time is small compared to the half-life so I thought I could apply that to this question too. I don't know why they didn't do it on this question.. is it maybe because we know that the atom is known, that we now tht it is radium and we can calculate A through the formula?
 
  • #4
Drizzy said:
okay I will try to explain it. 1 g is 0,001 kg. Then I divided it by1,66 * 10^-27 because I want to convert it from kg to u. And then when I have it in u I took it and divided it by how much one atom weighs so that I know how many atoms there are.

You don't care how much an atom of radium weighs, only how many atoms of radium you start with.

You know that 1 mole of Ra-226 will contain a fixed number of atoms, namely Avogadro's number, which is 6.022 × 1023 atoms. You figure out how many moles 1 g of radium is by dividing this amount by the molecular weight of radium, which in this case is 226. The corollary to this is that 226 g of Ra-226 = 1 mole of atoms, by definition.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mole_(unit)

My book uses this method at times.. they say that we pretend that the activity is constant when the time is small compared to the half-life so I thought I could apply that to this question too. I don't know why they didn't do it on this question.. is it maybe because we know that the atom is known, that we now tht it is radium and we can calculate A through the formula?
I just don't think you have calculated the initial number of atoms of radium correctly, regardless of what method your book seems to use.
 
  • #5
my book got 2,66 * 10^21 atoms. if I calculate this:

(0,001/1,660539*10^-27)/226,0260974 I et exactly 2,66 * 10^21 So it seems to be right
 
  • #6
Drizzy said:
my book got 2,66 * 10^21 atoms. if I calculate this:

(0,001/1,660539*10^-27)/226,0260974 I et exactly 2,66 * 10^21 So it seems to be right

That's the same number as dividing Avogadro by the MW of radium (226). Less fuss using moles.

So, this means that your decay rate is calculated incorrectly. The number which you claim is the number of decays in the OP doesn't seem to use the HL of radium.
 
  • #7
I don't know how to use moles.

the key= 1 mole Radiums is 226 grams. How am I supposed to know this?
 
  • #8
never mind i figured it out :) Thanx for helping out :P
 
  • #9
Drizzy said:
I don't know how to use moles.

the key= 1 mole Radiums is 226 grams. How am I supposed to know this?
By knowing the definition of what a mole is, just like you know what a kilogram is or what a meter is. I even provided a link.

The mole is not some obscure concept. It's what most of chemistry is based on as well as working with the ideal gas laws in physics.

PV = nRT, the n represents the number of moles of gas.
 

1. How is Becquerel (Bq) related to Curie (Ci)?

Becquerel (Bq) and Curie (Ci) are both units used to measure the activity of a radioactive substance. They are related by the following equation: 1 Curie = 3.7 x 10^10 Becquerel. This means that 1 Ci is equal to 3.7 x 10^10 Bq.

2. How do I convert from Bq to Ci?

To convert from Bq to Ci, you can use the conversion factor of 1 Curie = 3.7 x 10^10 Becquerel. Simply divide the number of Bq by 3.7 x 10^10 to get the equivalent value in Ci.

3. Is 1 Bq equal to 1 Ci?

No, 1 Bq is not equal to 1 Ci. 1 Curie is equal to 3.7 x 10^10 Bq, so 1 Ci is a much larger unit than 1 Bq.

4. Can there be a negative number of Bq or Ci?

No, there cannot be a negative number of Bq or Ci. Both units measure the activity of a radioactive substance, which is always a positive value.

5. Why are both Bq and Ci used to measure radioactivity?

Bq is the standard unit of measurement for radioactivity in the International System of Units (SI). However, Ci is still commonly used in the United States and is a larger unit, making it easier to express values for highly radioactive substances. Both units are accepted and used in different parts of the world.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
859
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
517
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
239
Back
Top