- #1
Nelphine
- 11
- 0
If we assume that the Twin Prime Conjecture is true (and thus there are infinite number of primes that are 2 apart), how reasonable is it to assume that there will be an infinite number of Twin Primes that are preceded by a prime that is at least 10 lower than the first of the Twin Primes? (I actually only need it to be at least 8 lower, but that's not actually possible, so 10 it is.) As clarification, if the preceding prime was 1000 lower than the pair of Twin Primes, that would be fine.
What if I also assume that the K Prime Conjecture holds?
In other words, even assuming that the Twin (or K) Prime Conjecture holds, what can we assume about the distance between triples of primes (as opposed to pairs of primes)
What if I also assume that the K Prime Conjecture holds?
In other words, even assuming that the Twin (or K) Prime Conjecture holds, what can we assume about the distance between triples of primes (as opposed to pairs of primes)