How the sugar industry shifted blame to fat

[bohm2]

Early warning signals of the coronary heart disease (CHD) risk of sugar (sucrose) emerged in the 1950s. We examined Sugar Research Foundation (SRF) internal documents, historical reports, and statements relevant to early debates about the dietary causes of CHD and assembled findings chronologically into a narrative case study. The SRF sponsored its first CHD research project in 1965, a literature review published in the New England Journal of Medicine, which singled out fat and cholesterol as the dietary causes of CHD and downplayed evidence that sucrose consumption was also a risk factor. The SRF set the review’s objective, contributed articles for inclusion, and received drafts. The SRF’s funding and role was not disclosed. Together with other recent analyses of sugar industry documents, our findings suggest the industry sponsored a research program in the 1960s and 1970s that successfully cast doubt about the hazards of sucrose while promoting fat as the dietary culprit in CHD. Policymaking committees should consider giving less weight to food industry–funded studies and include mechanistic and animal studies as well as studies appraising the effect of added sugars on multiple CHD biomarkers and disease development.

http://www.drperlmutter.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/isc160005.pdf

 

[jim mcnamara]

@bohm2
Since you are citing news sources, and drperlmutter's site (especially) - which are not peer reviewed, this needs to be in General Discussion. If you had cited the JAMA work and not the other stuff we could leave it. FYI, PF guidelines.

It is interesting and we have had other threads on the subject.