MHB How to Sort Elements of a Matrix in O(n) Time Complexity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on developing an efficient algorithm to sort a matrix of integers ranging from 1 to 100 in O(n) time complexity. The proposed method involves counting occurrences of each integer using a count array. Initially, the user incorrectly sets the size of the matrix and count array, leading to confusion in the counting logic. A correction is suggested to use a count array of size 101, allowing direct indexing based on the integer values. The revised algorithm includes initializing the count array, accurately counting occurrences from the input matrix, and populating a new matrix based on these counts. The complexity analysis confirms that the algorithm operates in O(n) time, as the loops run a fixed number of times or proportional to the size of the input matrix.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

Let a matrix with $n$ integers in the interval $[1,100]$. I want to write an algorithm that sorts the elements of the matrix in $O(n)$. [Hint: Count and use the number of times that each number appears]

I have thought the following:

We create a matrix with $100$ entries. If the matrix contains for example 1 $1$ we put 1 at the first cell. I have written this as follows:
Code:
int matrix[100]
int count[100]
int new_matrix[n]

for i=0 to 99 
     count[i]=0
end
for i=0 to 99
     if matrix[i]=i+1
        then count[i]=count[i]+1
end
j=0
for i=0 to 99
     if (count[i] not 0)
        while (count[i] not 0)
                 new_matrix[j]=matrix[i]
                 j=j+1
                 count[i]=count[i]-1
         end
end
for (i=0 to j-1)
     print(new_matrix[i])
end
The first and second for are executed $100$ times and the third $100 \cdot j=100 \cdot n$ times, right?

So the complexity is $O(100)+O(100 \cdot n)=O(n)$.

Or have I done something wrong? (Thinking)
 
Last edited:
Technology news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

Let a matrix with $n$ integers in the interval $[1,100]$. I want to write an algorithm that sorts the elements of the matrix in $O(n)$. [Hint: Count and use the number of times that each number appears]

I have thought the following:

We create a matrix with $100$ entries. If the matrix contains for example 1 $1$ we put 1 at the first cell. I have written this as follows:
Code:
int matrix[100]
int count[100]
int new_matrix[n]

for i=0 to 99 
     count[i]=0
end
for i=0 to 99
     if matrix[i]=i+1
        then count[i]=count[i]+1
end
j=0
for i=0 to 99
     if (count[i] not 0)
        while (count[i] not 0)
                 new_matrix[j]=matrix[i]
                 j=j+1
                 count[i]=count[i]-1
         end
end
for (i=0 to j-1)
     print(new_matrix[i])
end
The first and second for are executed $100$ times and the third $100 \cdot j=100 \cdot n$ times, right?

So the complexity is $O(100)+O(100 \cdot n)=O(n)$.

Or have I done something wrong? (Thinking)
Hi evinda,

I see a few errors in what you did.

I understand that 'matrix' is the given matrix; its size should be $n$, not $100$.

I would suggest to make the count array 101 elements long, and leave count[0] unused. In this way, the index of the count array corresponds directly to the value of an element in the input matrix.

The declarations are then:
Code:
int matrix[n]
int count[101]
int new_matrix[n]

The first loop will then become:
Code:
for i = 1 to 100
  count[i] = 0

The second loop (that counts the elements) is not correct. You only update a count if matrix contains i+1. In fact, each element in the matrix should update one element of the count array. A more correct implementation would be:

Code:
for i = 0 to n
    count[matrix[i]] = count[matrix[i]]+1

where I assume that you have declared count as int[101] as explained above (this is only a minor detail, but it makes things less error-prone).

You can then fill the output matrix as:

Code:
j = 0
for i = 1 to 100
  while count[i] > 0
        new_matrix[j] = i
        j = j+1
        count[i]=count[i]-1

which is almost what you did, except that the value to be stored is i, not matrix. Note also that i ranges from 1 to 100 instead of 0 to 99, as per the reamrk above.

Now, the first loop (that clears the count array) will be executed $100$ times, which is $O(1)$.

The second loop (that counts the elements) will be executed $n$ times, which is $O(n)$.

In each execution of the final loop, one element of new_matrix will be assigned. As we do not loose any element (the total count is preserved), this loop will also execute in $O(n)$.
 
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...
Back
Top