How to use physics to prove historical events?

In summary, the conversation discussed the sinking of the Titanic and whether it was caused by hitting an ice mountain or a torpedo. Some factors that were mentioned as potential evidence include material specifications, speed of the ship, temperature of the water, and the presence of a picture showing the point of impact. However, the thread was closed due to the lack of evidence supporting any conspiracy theories.
  • #1
hagopbul
357
36
TL;DR Summary
We want to use physics to prove historical event
Hello all:

Watching few news , titanic came and we start to have a question , can I prove that titanic was sunk because of hitting an ice mountain, and not because of torpedo, should we use material specifications , speed of the ship , and material specifications of the ice mountain

or we need other data like temperature of water ,..etc

I remember they found the titanic is there a picture of point of impact ?

Best
Hagop
 
  • Sad
Likes weirdoguy
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
  • Like
Likes hagopbul, Vanadium 50 and dlgoff
  • #3
I am sorry, but our rules forbid discussions of conspiracy theories of any kind. There is simply no evidence at all, especially as the construction of the bulkheads according to the plans makes such a cause extremely unlikely.

This thread will remain closed.
 
  • Like
Likes hagopbul, russ_watters, Bystander and 1 other person

1. How can physics be used to prove historical events?

Physics can be used to prove historical events by examining the physical evidence left behind. This includes analyzing artifacts, structures, and other material remains to determine their age, composition, and any changes that may have occurred over time. By applying the laws of physics, such as gravity, motion, and energy, to these physical objects, scientists can gather information about past events and support historical claims.

2. What types of physics are commonly used in proving historical events?

The most commonly used types of physics in proving historical events include archaeophysics, geophysics, and forensic physics. Archaeophysics uses techniques such as radiocarbon dating and thermoluminescence to determine the age of artifacts. Geophysics uses methods like ground-penetrating radar and magnetometry to study the composition and structure of the earth to uncover hidden archaeological features. Forensic physics applies principles of physics to analyze evidence in criminal investigations, which can also be used to support historical claims.

3. How does physics help in determining the accuracy of historical records?

Physics can help in determining the accuracy of historical records by providing a scientific basis for events described in these records. For example, if a historical document claims that a building was destroyed by an earthquake, geophysical analysis of the site can confirm if there was indeed an earthquake at that time. Additionally, physics can also help in identifying any discrepancies or inconsistencies in historical records, which can lead to a better understanding of the events in question.

4. Can physics be used to disprove historical events?

Yes, physics can be used to disprove historical events if the physical evidence contradicts the claims made in historical records. For instance, if a historical text claims that a certain object was created in a specific time period, but radiocarbon dating of the object shows a much older age, then the claim can be considered inaccurate. However, it is important to note that other factors, such as human error or intentional deception, may also contribute to the inaccuracy of historical events.

5. Are there any limitations to using physics to prove historical events?

Yes, there are limitations to using physics to prove historical events. One limitation is that not all historical events leave behind physical evidence that can be analyzed using physics. For example, cultural practices or societal norms may not leave behind physical traces, making it difficult to use physics to support historical claims. Additionally, the accuracy of using physics to prove historical events also depends on the accuracy and reliability of the methods and techniques used, as well as the interpretation of the data collected.

Similar threads

I What false hints of new physics were most notable?
    • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
30
Views
7K
Is my fictional Solar System stable and realistic?
    • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
1K
B Need help with understanding time travel
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
1K
An addition to respiratory Personal Protection Equipment
    • Biology and Medical
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Where can I find publicly accessible data from observatories in Europe?
    • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
946
A IceCube rules out last SM explanation of ANITA’s anomalous neutrinos
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Writing: Input Wanted Captain's choices on colony ships
    • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Unlearning the Block Universe: How Relativity Challenges Our Perception of Time
    • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
90
Views
5K
I Black holes and the relativity of simultaneity
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
Impact of heat on most classical physics problems
    • Thermodynamics
Replies
4
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top