Important reason for squashing software bugs accuracy of scientific discoveries

In summary: The CERN conference will begin at:3.40pm: Press conference begins. If you have questions, you can tweet them to the Cern press office with the hashtag #higgsupdate.
  • #1
rhody
Gold Member
681
3
CERN's[/PLAIN] boson hunters tackle big data bug infestation
It's the software or the science that's been wrong

CERN says it has squashed 40,000 bugs living in ROOT, the C++ framework it is relied upon to store, crunch and help analyse petabytes of data from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The massive collider generates 15PB of data each year from 600 million proton collisions per second.

ROOT contains 3.5 million lines of code while CERN's army of 10,000 physicists have surrounded that core with a further 50 million lines of software they have built to try and sift out Higgs boson from the petabytes. Higgs boson is the particle that theoretically gives mass to all other particles, but it has to date proved elusive.

The bugs have lived in ROOT since the data-munching framework came online in 1995, and were only finally winkled out using the application of commercially available static-code analysis tools from development testing specialist Coverity.

CERN reckons the bugs had helped muddy results from the LHC, throwing them off the Higgs-boson scent. Further, there were programs built by those 10,000 scientists that could never be properly tested prior to Coverity.
One's analysis when processing experimental data must account for possible errors in the tools used to identify and detect expected behavior, not an easy task, which is why multiple, usually three or more methods are deemed necessary to rule out the possibility for false or erroneous results, before staking one's reputation and credibility on the accuracy of them.

Rhody...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


That wasn't their big announcement, was it??
 
  • #3


jhae2.718 said:
That wasn't their big announcement, was it??
No, I was just providing insight into how they verified the software for the data analysis tools that CERN uses. From the wiki link, apparently the Coverity Toolset is used by US Homeland Security as well.

I find it odd that it is now 10:30 am EST in the US and about 3:30 PM in Geneva, and their isn't any internet stories breaking yet, previous experience with this sort of thing usually means about an hour to two hour delay before it hits the "Net", so to speak. If the conference is at 2 pm their time, I would expect to see news breaking in the next hour or so, so stay tuned.

Rhody...
 
  • #4


FYI, According to this story... the CERN conference will begin at:
3.40pm: Press conference begins. If you have questions, you can tweet them to the Cern press office with the hashtag #higgsupdate
If this time is correct, I anticipate the announcement at or before 12:40 EST in the US from internet sources, not mainstream media, TV, radio which will be ahead of the curve, so to speak.

edit:

This story does include details of the conference, but they are only quotes out of context so I would wait for the official News feed from CERN for the whole story.

Rhody...
 
Last edited:
  • #5


I wholeheartedly agree with the importance of addressing software bugs in order to ensure the accuracy of scientific discoveries. In the field of particle physics, where the data being analyzed is incredibly complex and vast, it is crucial that the software used to process and interpret this data is reliable and error-free.

The fact that CERN has identified and fixed 40,000 bugs in their ROOT framework is a testament to the dedication and diligence of the scientists and engineers involved in this project. It is also a reminder of the importance of continually reviewing and improving software tools in order to ensure the validity of our scientific findings.

Inaccurate or faulty software can lead to incorrect conclusions and potentially hinder the progress of scientific research. It is therefore essential that we invest in the proper testing and validation of software tools, as well as regularly updating and maintaining them to prevent the accumulation of bugs over time.

I am glad to see that CERN has taken proactive steps to address this issue and I hope that other scientific institutions will also prioritize the maintenance and improvement of their software systems in order to safeguard the integrity of their research.
 

1. What is the importance of squashing software bugs in the accuracy of scientific discoveries?

Squashing software bugs is crucial in ensuring the accuracy of scientific discoveries. These bugs can cause errors and inconsistencies in data, leading to incorrect conclusions and findings. By fixing these bugs, scientists can have confidence in the reliability of their data and results.

2. How do software bugs affect the accuracy of scientific discoveries?

Software bugs can have a significant impact on the accuracy of scientific discoveries. They can alter data, skew results, and even cause experiments to fail. Additionally, if left undetected, these bugs can lead to false conclusions and hinder the progress of scientific research.

3. Can software bugs be the reason for inaccurate scientific discoveries?

Yes, software bugs can be a major contributing factor to inaccurate scientific discoveries. These bugs can introduce errors in data collection, analysis, and interpretation, leading to incorrect conclusions. It is crucial for scientists to identify and fix these bugs to ensure the validity of their findings.

4. How can squashing software bugs improve the reproducibility of scientific discoveries?

Reproducibility is a key aspect of scientific research, and squashing software bugs can greatly improve it. By eliminating bugs, scientists can ensure that their experiments and results can be replicated by others, thus increasing the credibility and reliability of their discoveries.

5. What are the potential consequences of not addressing software bugs in scientific research?

Not addressing software bugs in scientific research can have serious consequences. Inaccurate data, false conclusions, and wasted time and resources are just a few potential outcomes. It can also damage the reputation of the researchers and the credibility of their findings. Therefore, it is essential to prioritize and fix software bugs in scientific research.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
2
Replies
39
Views
12K
  • Cosmology
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top