Indivisible units of time and the quantum eraser experiment

Gaz1982
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
If we take an indivisible unit of time (a Planck time perhaps), could the possible retro-causality hinted at in the Quantum Eraser Experiment be a process where the retro-causality goes back along the same plank unit rather than back in time per se

Metaphor - I don't travel to a different train carriage, just the back of the same carriage.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no indications of indivisible units of time. Time is the same on micro scales as it is in macro scales, it doesn't even have the same rate for different velocities or locations in a gravity well, meaning one second for one location could be two seconds for a different location but the physics remains the same locally. The quantum eraser experiments have been done with not nearly enough time for a delayed choice to affect what occurred at a fork "a long time ago" by photon propagation time scales.

In a train analogy, what happens is when the engine at the front of the train has a choice to go left or right and someone at the back of the train says "I don't know which way we are going". As soon as the engineer determines which track to take, the person at the back of the train "instantly" knows a choice has been made, long before any information could reach them.
 
jerromyjon said:
There is no indications of indivisible units of time. Time is the same on micro scales as it is in macro scales, it doesn't even have the same rate for different velocities or locations in a gravity well, meaning one second for one location could be two seconds for a different location but the physics remains the same locally. The quantum eraser experiments have been done with not nearly enough time for a delayed choice to affect what occurred at a fork "a long time ago" by photon propagation time scales.

In a train analogy, what happens is when the engine at the front of the train has a choice to go left or right and someone at the back of the train says "I don't know which way we are going". As soon as the engineer determines which track to take, the person at the back of the train "instantly" knows a choice has been made, long before any information could reach them.
How could we divide light traveling a Planck length in a vacuum?
 
Gaz1982 said:
How could we divide light traveling a Planck length in a vacuum?
Into as many "slices" of time that makes sense. If it were a very high energy gamma photon, it could have 1000's of waves in that distance.
 
Gaz1982 said:
If we take an indivisible unit of time (a Planck time perhaps), could the possible retro-causality hinted at in the Quantum Eraser Experiment be a process where the retro-causality goes back along the same plank unit rather than back in time per se
There's no particular reason to think that the Planck time is indivisible... but even if it were, how does it compare with the time differences involved in the delayed choice experiment?

jerromyjon said:
If it were a very high energy gamma photon, it could have 1000's of waves in that distance.
It would be a good exercise to calculate the energy of such a photon, see how it compares against the energy of various other interesting phenomena.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top