Infinite union of closed sets that isn't closed?

In summary, an infinite union of closed sets is a collection of an unlimited number of closed sets. However, it is considered "not closed" when the union of all these sets does not have a closed boundary, meaning there is at least one point that does not belong to any of the sets in the union. An example of this is the union of all closed intervals [0, 1/n] for n = 1, 2, 3, ..., infinity, where the point 0 is not included in any of the intervals. This concept is significant in topology and analysis as it challenges the intuition that the union of closed sets should also be closed. An infinite union of closed sets can be closed in certain scenarios, such as
  • #1
autre
117
0
So I have to find an infinite union of closed sets that isn't closed. I've thought of something that might work:

[itex]\bigcup[0,x][/itex] where [itex]0\leq x<1[/itex]. Then, [itex]\bigcup[0,x] = [0,1)[/itex], right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, that is correct. 1 is not in that union because it is not in [0, x] for any x<1. If y< 1, however, there does exist x> y and y is in such [0, x]. Therefore the union contains all of [0, 1).
 
  • #3
Or, you can apply DeMorgan to an intersection of opens that is not open, like (0,1/n).
 

1. What is an infinite union of closed sets that isn't closed?

An infinite union of closed sets is a collection of sets that includes an unlimited number of closed sets. It is considered to be "not closed" when the union of all these sets does not have a closed boundary, meaning that there is at least one point that does not belong to any of the sets in the union.

2. What is an example of an infinite union of closed sets that isn't closed?

An example of an infinite union of closed sets that isn't closed is the union of all closed intervals [0, 1/n] for n = 1, 2, 3, ..., infinity. This union includes an infinite number of closed sets, but the point 0 is not included in any of the intervals, making the boundary not closed.

3. What is the significance of an infinite union of closed sets that isn't closed?

An infinite union of closed sets that isn't closed is significant in topology and analysis because it challenges the intuition that the union of closed sets should also be closed. This concept highlights the importance of understanding the boundary of a set and how it can affect the properties of the set.

4. Can an infinite union of closed sets ever be closed?

Yes, an infinite union of closed sets can be closed in certain scenarios. For example, if the sets in the union have a finite intersection, then the union will also have a closed boundary and therefore be closed.

5. How does an infinite union of closed sets that isn't closed relate to the concept of compactness?

An infinite union of closed sets that isn't closed is an example of a non-compact set. This means that the set cannot be covered by a finite number of open sets, making it a counterexample to the concept of compactness. This highlights the importance of understanding the limitations of compact sets and the need for more general definitions, such as that of a closed set.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
762
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
364
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
939
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top