I Instability of hydrogen ground state if the time-reversal operator is unitary

ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
Apparently if we try to represent the time reversal operator by a unitary operator ##T## satisfying ##U(t)T = TU(-t)##, then the ground state of hydrogen (the hamiltonian of which is time-reversal invariant) is unstable. But if ##T## is anti-unitary (i.e. ##\langle a | T^{\dagger} T | b \rangle = \langle a | b \rangle^*##) then the instability is avoided. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ergospherical said:
Apparently
According to ...?
 
I guess ##U(t)=\exp(-\mathrm{i} H t)## is the time-evolution operator (for the states in the Schrödinger picture). If you want to have
$$U(-t)=\exp(\mathrm{i} t H) = T^{\dagger} U(t) T = \exp[T^{\dagger} (-\mathrm{i} t H) \hat{T}],$$
you must have
$$T^{\dagger} (-\mathrm{i} t H) \hat{T}=+\mathrm{i} t H.$$
Since ##t \in \mathbb{R}## for both ##T## unitary or antiunitary that implies
$$T^{\dagger} i H T=-\mathrm{i} H.$$
If ##T## where unitary, that would imply that ##T^{\dagger} H T=-H##, which implies that for any eigenvalue ##E## of ##H## also ##-E## must be an eigenvector:
$$H T |E \rangle=T T^{\dagger} H T |E \rangle=-T H |E \rangle=-E T |E \rangle,$$
i.e., indeed ##T|E \rangle## is an eigenvector of eigenvalue ##(-E)##. Since now the energy spectrum for a free particle (or that of an electron in presence of a Coulomb potential) has a lower bound, ##T## cannot be a symmetry operator if realized as a unitary operator, which implies that time-reversal symmetry must be realized by an anti-unitary symmetry operator.
 
  • Like
Likes strangerep, ergospherical and dextercioby
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top