A Interpreting SDSS extragalactic data in the era of JWST

AI Thread Summary
Empirical evidence from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) challenges the ΛCDM standard model of Big Bang cosmology, highlighting inconsistencies with the Hubble constant, clustering parameter, and other anomalies. A new predictive "temporal geometry" model is proposed, which aligns with SDSS data and may address these cosmological tensions, though it requires further validation from the scientific community. The discussion emphasizes the significance of data interpretation in cosmology, particularly with the impending launch of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). This advancement is expected to yield groundbreaking discoveries that could reshape our understanding of the universe. The ongoing dialogue reflects the dynamic nature of cosmological research and its implications for future studies.
afmayer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
MAGIC23 Workshop (Matter, Astrophysics, Gravitation, Ions and Cosmology)
Talk aimed at an explanation of the reported puzzling JWST high-z images
• CERN talk : indico.cern.ch/event/1153372/contributions/5200955/
• Presentation materials : bit.ly/MAGIC23AMayer
• CERN MAGIC23 : indico.cern.ch/event/1153372/
Talk Description (Abstract)
We present empirical evidence from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), including statistically-significant, independent measurements of galaxy theta-z, redshift-magnitude, and redshift-population. These corroborating data sets are clearly inconsistent with the optimal ΛCDM standard model of Big Bang cosmology, exacerbating the Hubble constant tension; the σ8 (clustering parameter) discrepancy; the lensing anomaly; the large-angular-scale anomalies in CMB temperature and polarization; and other anomalies that now confront cosmologists. A set of predictive equations are put forward that are consistent with de Sitter's exact solution to the Einstein field equations; this new predictive "temporal geometry" model, which requires vetting by the mathematical physics and cosmology communities, is consistent with the SDSS data and relieves the unexpected new tensions in cosmology created by initial and ongoing JWST observations.
 
Space news on Phys.org


The CERN talk and presentation materials provide a fascinating look into the current state of interpreting extragalactic data in the era of the upcoming James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). The speaker presents empirical evidence from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) that challenges the current standard model of Big Bang cosmology and raises important questions about the Hubble constant, clustering parameter, lensing anomaly, and other anomalies that have been observed.

The speaker also introduces a new predictive "temporal geometry" model that is consistent with the SDSS data and offers a potential solution to these tensions in cosmology. However, they also acknowledge that this model requires further vetting by the mathematical physics and cosmology communities.

Overall, this talk highlights the exciting and ever-evolving nature of cosmology and the important role that data interpretation plays in shaping our understanding of the universe. With the upcoming launch of the JWST, we can expect even more groundbreaking discoveries and challenges to our current models of the universe, and it will be fascinating to see how this new data will impact our understanding of the cosmos.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top