Is it possible to break this baseball bat with the heel of the foot?

  • Thread starter Username34
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Baseball
  • #1
Username34
20
6
The thai does it with the shinbone which is much harder material than that piece of wood. So I'm not chocked at all.

Can you however break that thing which the much softer heel, covered in so much skin padding? Say with back kick (donkey/horse kick).

No matter how much you crank up the speed, isn't there a limit to the softness of the heel?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF.
Username34 said:
No matter how much you crank up the speed, isn't there a limit to the softness of the heel?
The bone in the heel is big and hard, yet it can still be broken by unusual external forces, applied through the external soft flesh, without damage to the flesh.
The flesh on the heel includes unusual structures, some are described here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heel

The toes and the front part of the foot, form a soft suspension system, that reduces shock loads on the skeleton when walking. The heel is harder, and is reserved for standing, and some more unusual foot impacts.

The flesh on the heel may be soft, but it forms a cup about the bone, that transfers a wide area of ground contact pressure onto the skeleton, through the heel bone. For that reason, the heel may be able to apply greater forces, without damage to the body, than other parts of the foot.

You might analyse the flesh on the heel bone as having evolved to protect the bone from the most common external impacts. You might also analyse the flesh as an impedance matching medium, between the skeleton and the ground. Both those approaches show that the presence of the soft flesh, will increase the peak force that can be applied between the heel and an external object.
 
  • #3
Baluncore said:
Welcome to PF.

The bone in the heel is big and hard, yet it can still be broken by unusual external forces, applied through the external soft flesh, without damage to the flesh.
The flesh on the heel includes unusual structures, some are described here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heel

The toes and the front part of the foot, form a soft suspension system, that reduces shock loads on the skeleton when walking. The heel is harder, and is reserved for standing, and some more unusual foot impacts.

The flesh on the heel may be soft, but it forms a cup about the bone, that transfers a wide area of ground contact pressure onto the skeleton, through the heel bone. For that reason, the heel may be able to apply greater forces, without damage to the body, than other parts of the foot.

You might analyse the flesh on the heel bone as having evolved to protect the bone from the most common external impacts. You might also analyse the flesh as an impedance matching medium, between the skeleton and the ground. Both those approaches show that the presence of the soft flesh, will increase the peak force that can be applied between the heel and an external object.

Yes but the comparison was to the shin bone. Do you think the heel is strong enough to break the bat with all the padding surrounding it? It obviously cushions the intended blow.
 
  • #4
The heel is more than strong enough. It was designed for the job. The same force, applied to the shin-bone, is being applied in a way the shin-bone was designed to limit. The bending flexibility of the shin-bone, is the only reason it survives, while the skin is damaged.

The bending of the shin-bone, is a greater limitation, than the softness of the flesh on the heel.
 
  • #5
Baluncore said:
The heel is more than strong enough. It was designed for the job. The same force, applied to the shin-bone, is being applied in a way the shin-bone was designed to limit. The bending flexibility of the shin-bone, is the only reason it survives, while the skin is damaged.

The bending of the shin-bone, is a greater limitation, than the softness of the flesh on the heel.
But you require more speed for the heel than the shine bone for an equal amount of damage, since it's much softer.
 
  • #6
Baluncore said:
The bending of the shin-bone, is a greater limitation, than the softness of the flesh on the heel.

How would you compare the skin heel with plastic shoe heel. Is that one tough to calculate the difference in mass? Given that the shoe might allow you to go harder before reaching a resistance threshold?
 
  • #7
Here's a heel kick with the shoes on. By me.

 
  • #8
Username34 said:
Do you think the heel is strong enough to break the bat with all the padding surrounding it?
I can break anything in a YouTube video. Just sayin' :wink:
 
  • #9
Username34 said:
But you require more speed for the heel than the shine bone for an equal amount of damage, since it's much softer.
I think you are overestimating the softness of the flesh on the heel.

Boxing gloves prevent local damage, while allowing the momentum of the arm and shoulder, to be transferred efficiently to the opponent's body.

Once contact with the heel is made, the large contact area of the flesh heel-pad locks in place, and so will appear to be more solid, backed by the heel-bone and the momentum of the leg.
 
  • #10
Baluncore said:
I think you are overestimating the softness of the flesh on the heel.

Boxing gloves prevent local damage, while allowing the momentum of the arm and shoulder, to be transferred efficiently to the opponent's body.

Once contact with the heel is made, the large contact area of the flesh heel-pad locks in place, and so will appear to be more solid, backed by the heel-bone and the momentum of the leg.

The thais condition their shine bone to be able to go 100%.

As to gloves vs bare knuckle, bare knuckles generate 27% more force than gloves as measured here

Bare fist - 815 pounds (370 kg of force)

Boxing glove 641 pounds (291 kg)
 
  • #11
Username34 said:
The thais condition their shine bone to be able to go 100%.
By definition, any bone breaks above 100%.

Username34 said:
As to gloves vs bare knuckle, bare knuckles generate 27% more force than gloves as measured here
Physical injuries to the boxer's hands, and to the target, are reduced by gloves. The flesh on the heel better protects the skeleton from damage.

There is a difference between boxing as a sport, and fighting to maximise injury to your opponent. You and your opponent are less likely to die, if you are both wearing boxing gloves. If you want to kill your opponent, shoot them.
 
  • #12
Baluncore said:
By definition, any bone breaks above 100%.Physical injuries to the boxer's hands, and to the target, are reduced by gloves. The flesh on the heel better protects the skeleton from damage.

There is a difference between boxing as a sport, and fighting to maximise injury to your opponent. You and your opponent are less likely to die, if you are both wearing boxing gloves. If you want to kill your opponent, shoot them.

Let's stick to the science. Padding reduces force. Skin padding is probably sturdier than boxing gloves. A lot of boxers break their hands despite wrapping + gloves.
 
  • #13
Username34 said:
Can you however break that thing which the much softer heel, covered in so much skin padding? Say with back kick (donkey/horse kick).
Absolutely. The only reason that 'back/mule/donkey kick' is rarely seen in martial arts is that it is slow and not practical. But regarding transferred power and safety, it's absolutely a winner.
Heels are made to 'kick' earth with enough force to keep 80kg 'floating' in the air...
... well, that's quite bit of simplification but not entirely wrong.

Look up door breaking/breaching techniques.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #14
Username34 said:
Let's stick to the science. Padding reduces force.
That is not science.
It is the local peak pressure that is reduced by padding, by distributing the force over a wider area.
 
  • #15
Baluncore said:
It is the local peak pressure that is reduced by padding, by distributing the force over a wider area.

Which equals less damage.
 
  • #16
Rive said:
Absolutely. The only reason that 'back/mule/donkey kick' is rarely seen in martial arts is that it is slow and not practical.
They are quite popular in martial arts, but they don't end fights as much one might think.. They require timing and distance due to the padded heeL.

A shin bone hurts no matter speed.
 
  • #17
Username34 said:
Which equals less damage.
Less damage to the heel, but not to the target.
 
  • #18
Username34 said:
They are quite popular in martial arts, but they don't end fights as much one might think..
I don't see them often. Since heels are not in front, it requires quite some work (and time) to bring them forward => not practical. A very cooperative opponent is needed...
Username34 said:
A shin bone hurts no matter speed.
Sure. But I think you meant, that it hurts for the opponent....
You should check up how they look like after a 'good' match.
I won't post those pics here.
 
  • #19
Rive said:
I don't see them often. Since heels are not in front, it requires quite some work (and time) to bring them forward => not practical. A very cooperative opponent is needed...
They are there but it's blink and you miss it in a fight.

 
  • #20
Having a case of plantar fasciitis that is just beginning to resolve, I find this thread very triggering.
 
  • #21
Swamp Thing said:
I find this thread very triggering.
You have my sympathy. It is a memorable pain triggering topic.
I broke my heel-bone, but it went undiagnosed for a month while I walked on the toes. The other leg got the immediate surgical reconstruction, which justified the crutches.
The lesson learned. Don't try to kick half a tonne of steel out of the way when it is chasing you.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre, pinball1970 and Swamp Thing
  • #22
Baluncore said:
You have my sympathy. It is a memorable pain triggering topic.
I broke my heel-bone, but it went undiagnosed for a month while I walked on the toes. The other leg got the immediate surgical reconstruction, which justified the crutches.
The lesson learned. Don't try to kick half a tonne of steel out of the way when it is chasing you
Painful!
 
  • #23
Username34 said:
A shin bone hurts no matter speed.
All that training cannot do much to protect it from a direct hit, especially when the opponents leg is planted firmly on the ground. (Also one of the reasons why "studs up" tackle or "over the ball" tackles are heavily punished in soccer. )

Back to MMA, That low kick to the leg is just so dangerous in martial arts, if the fighter generates enough power one of those legs could break.
Watch with the below (leg break MMA) with the sound down, see how innocuous the blow looks at 3 seconds? The swing is quite quick but not super human. The opponents leg moves to the side a little on contact.
EDIT: You see his leg break and the mods may object so I decided against it. I am interested in why the bones break so easily without seeming to inflict any sort of damage to the opponent.
The heel stamp would be similar to jabbing an object/opponent with a pole as opposed to swinging at it like a round house.
 
Last edited:
  • #24
Baluncore said:
Less damage to the heel, but not to the target.
11.21 overview
spinning wheel ( heel) 62,00
spinning back (heel) - 75.00
roundhouse kick (shin) - 163,423

Hardness wins

 

1. Can a human break a baseball bat with the heel of their foot?

No, typically a human cannot break a baseball bat with just the heel of their foot under normal circumstances. Breaking a baseball bat requires significant force that usually exceeds the capability of an unaided human foot, especially considering the strength and construction of a standard wooden or metal bat.

2. What amount of force is needed to break a baseball bat?

The amount of force required to break a baseball bat can vary depending on the material of the bat (e.g., wood, aluminum), but for a wooden bat, it typically ranges between 4500 to 7000 pounds of force. This level of force is difficult to achieve with just the heel of the foot.

3. Are there any specific techniques or conditions under which a baseball bat might be more easily broken by the heel of the foot?

While breaking a bat with the heel of the foot is highly unlikely, factors such as the bat's material condition (e.g., already cracked or weakened), or applying force at its weakest point (typically the handle or just above the handle) might make it slightly more feasible. Even then, it would require a significant and potentially harmful amount of force.

4. Has anyone ever successfully broken a baseball bat with their foot in recorded instances?

There are no widely recognized or verified records of someone breaking a baseball bat with just the heel of their foot. Most instances of bats breaking, particularly in sports contexts, involve much greater forces, such as those exerted by high-speed pitches or powerful swings.

5. What are the risks of attempting to break a baseball bat with the heel of the foot?

Attempting to break a baseball bat with the heel of the foot is highly discouraged as it poses significant risks of injury. These can include fractures, sprains, or severe bruising to the foot, ankle, and leg. The act of exerting such force can also lead to loss of balance and subsequent injuries from falling.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • General Engineering
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
3
Replies
78
Views
9K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top