Is it ture that scientists have found cure for cancer but

[l-1j-cho]

Is it ture that scientists have found cure for cancer but pharmaceutical company do not produce them because they cannot earn money?

 

[Jimmy Snyder]

I wouldn't believe Glenn Beck if he told me the sky was blue.

 

[Evo]

No..

 

[russ_watters]

[after the lock] Read the wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dichloroacetic_acid

 

[LudusRex]

I can say that there is currently no definitive cure for cancer. While there have been significant advancements in cancer treatment, it is a complex and multifaceted disease that requires ongoing research and development to find effective treatments. It is true that some pharmaceutical companies may prioritize profits over the needs of patients, but it is unfair to say that they are intentionally withholding a cure for cancer. The reality is that developing a successful treatment for cancer is a lengthy and expensive process, and companies need to recoup their investments in order to continue funding research and development. Additionally, there are strict regulations and ethical considerations surrounding the testing and production of pharmaceuticals, which can also impact the availability of potential cures. Ultimately, the search for a cure for cancer is a collaborative effort involving scientists, medical professionals, and pharmaceutical companies, and it is important to continue supporting and funding these efforts in order to improve outcomes for cancer patients.