Is Lifting Lower Weights Necessary to Keep Shape?

In summary, if a person lifts weights at a particular level and wants to maintain their current "shape," then there is no reason to left lower levels. Higher levels will make the person thicker, while lower levels will not provide the desired results.
  • #1
kyphysics
676
436
If a person lifts weights at a particular level (by level I mean the weight amount for each exercise) and wants to keep his or her current "shape," then is there any reason that person ought to left lower levels?

For example, let's say you curl 10 lbs. of dumbbells and like the figure you've gotten. You wouldn't want to lift more, right, because that'd make you "thicker." But, is there any reason to left less (say, doing 2 or 5 lb. curls)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hopefully you've been doing some reading about this. What do you mean by "shape"? Are you mostly interested in sculpting your body, or are you interested in developing power and endurance in your body?

(I am no expert on this) One school of thought on training is to mix lighter-weight/high-rep days with heavier-weight/low-rep days, to gain both power and endurance. I don't think that maximizes your body shape, though.

I am an endurance athlete (swim-bike-run), so most of my lifting sets are based on medium weight and high reps (like 30-35 reps that leave me wasted at the end).
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and Klystron
  • #3
I mean what physique you obtain by lifting x poundage of weights.

In other words, you don't want to get thicker, nor thinner. You just want to maintain whatever you look like AFTER having settled on a particular level of weights to exercise with.

In other words, if you curl 10 lbs. of weights and like the results you see, is there any reason to ever go lower? I know you wouldn't want to go higher (e.g., 15...20...25 lbs), as that would make you thicker in muscle. But, is there ever any reason to do 2...or 5 lb curls?
 
  • #4
I guess I am a maintenance athlete. I have preferred cable machines (Nautilus) weights to free weights since they became popular in the 1960's. I can only use free weights for light hand exercises as you describe. I prefer movement, endurance and strength to bulk.

When young I used what we called 'pyramid technique'. Say you can comfortably lift 20 lbs. in an exercise. You could lift 10 repetitions at 10 lbs., rest, 10 reps at 15 lbs., rest, then 10 reps at 20 lbs. or as many as comfortable. Rest, then 'walk down the pyramid': 15 lbs. for 10 reps, finishing at 10 reps of 10 pounds of weight.

This comprises a 'set'. Complete 3 or 4 sets then perform same using different muscles at appropriate weight levels. After completing 3 to 4 sets over several days, consider adding weight to the pyramid. In this example with 5 pound increments, try lifting 25 pounds. The pyramid then becomes 15-20-25-20-15 pounds. The idea is to challenge your body by changing weights but within your comfort zone to avoid strain and injury.

Pyramiding avoids boredom and the tendency to rush and leads to smooth lean muscle mass. Always move slowly. Never lift more than you can comfortably control. Breathe! Never hold your breath. Breath regularly. Exhale on the lift and inhale on the drop.

With a slow metabolism I need to warm up on a bike or with other aerobics before lifting. Like @berkeman I prefer swimming and a swimmer's physique (so to speak). Water supports your body but supplies resistance. With public pools temporarily closed, I am using weight machines, hand weights and elastic bands at physical therapy to maintain strength, balance and endurance.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and berkeman
  • #5
kyphysics said:
If a person lifts weights at a particular level (by level I mean the weight amount for each exercise) and wants to keep his or her current "shape," then is there any reason that person ought to left lower levels?

For example, let's say you curl 10 lbs. of dumbbells and like the figure you've gotten. You wouldn't want to lift more, right, because that'd make you "thicker." But, is there any reason to left less (say, doing 2 or 5 lb. curls)?
It's genetic, if you have a tendency to put muscle on you will. If you want to keep fit do cardio, cycling, running, swimming cross training.
Resistance training is more likely to put muscle on.

Work out your carb to energy out put ( there are apps apparently) keep a diary of what and when you eat.

Losing weight/flab is easy, you can do it and get fit in 4-6 weeks depending on your previous life style.

Gaining muscle is very difficult and takes time unless you are genetically blessed.

Edit: rule of thumb, high reps lower weights for maintenance.

Up your sets and weight slightly if it starts getting to easy.

You can pre exhaust first too, do more aerobic stuff first, weights then swim after.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes symbolipoint and Klystron
  • #6
kyphysics said:
If a person lifts weights at a particular level (by level I mean the weight amount for each exercise) and wants to keep his or her current "shape," then is there any reason that person ought to left lower levels?

For example, let's say you curl 10 lbs. of dumbbells and like the figure you've gotten. You wouldn't want to lift more, right, because that'd make you "thicker." But, is there any reason to left less (say, doing 2 or 5 lb. curls)?
To maintain a certain level of fitness or strength, one could do repetitions with lighter weights, and perhaps increase the speed at which one moves the weights. To increase one's strength, one would increase the weight. The point of lighter weights (masses) is resistance.

Running, swimming, cycling and rowing would be light repetition, which improves endurance/stamina.

When I was lifting weights and gaining strength, I would max the weight, but also mix lighter weights, and go running long distance and finish with quarter mile or 400-500 m sprint. I'd also play football (soccer) with friends, or cycle some distance.

These days, I typically work with 25 lb (11.34 kg) and 40 lb (18.14 kg) dumbbells, and occasionally 60 lb (13.22 kg) dumbbells, and cycle long distances with some elevation gain.
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and berkeman
  • #7
kyphysics said:
I mean what physique you obtain by lifting x poundage of weights.

In other words, you don't want to get thicker, nor thinner. You just want to maintain whatever you look like AFTER having settled on a particular level of weights to exercise with.

In other words, if you curl 10 lbs. of weights and like the results you see, is there any reason to ever go lower? I know you wouldn't want to go higher (e.g., 15...20...25 lbs), as that would make you thicker in muscle. But, is there ever any reason to do 2...or 5 lb curls?
Going down in weight would increase your cardio workout(heart) because you are doing more reps as long as you work the muscles to fatigue. You could still see gains in size this way,your workout would just take longer.
If you just want to mantain do less sets or don't workout as often.
 

1. Is lifting lower weights effective for maintaining muscle mass?

Yes, lifting lower weights can be effective for maintaining muscle mass. When done with proper form and technique, lifting lower weights can still stimulate muscle growth and strength. It is important to progressively overload the muscles by gradually increasing the weight to continue seeing results.

2. Will lifting lower weights make me bulkier or leaner?

This depends on your overall fitness goals and how you combine lifting lower weights with other forms of exercise and nutrition. Lifting lower weights can help build muscle, but it is unlikely to make you significantly bulkier unless that is your specific goal. It can also contribute to a leaner physique by increasing overall muscle mass and boosting metabolism.

3. Can I lift lower weights instead of heavier weights to avoid injury?

Lifting lower weights can help reduce the risk of injury compared to lifting heavier weights, as it puts less strain on the muscles and joints. However, it is important to still use proper form and technique when lifting at any weight to prevent injury. It may also be beneficial to incorporate a variety of weights and exercises into your routine to strengthen different muscles and avoid overuse injuries.

4. Is it necessary to lift lower weights for certain muscle groups?

It is not necessarily necessary to exclusively lift lower weights for certain muscle groups. It is important to have a well-rounded workout routine that targets all muscle groups and incorporates a variety of weights and exercises. Lifting lower weights can be beneficial for certain muscle groups, but it is not necessary to exclusively focus on them.

5. Can lifting lower weights help with weight loss?

Yes, lifting lower weights can help with weight loss by increasing muscle mass and boosting metabolism. This can lead to an increase in overall calorie burn and help with losing body fat. However, it is important to also incorporate cardiovascular exercise and maintain a healthy diet for optimal weight loss results.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
957
  • DIY Projects
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
15K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • DIY Projects
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top