Is Quantum Physics Non-Locality According to Einstein, Podolski, and Rosen?

  • Thread starter 4everlonging
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Einstein
In summary, the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox is a thought experiment that questions the completeness of quantum mechanics, involving two entangled particles and the concept of "spooky action at a distance." It highlights the tension between quantum mechanics and classical physics, challenges the principles of locality and realism, and has not yet been definitively resolved. The implications of the EPR paradox include further research in quantum mechanics and the need for a more comprehensive theory to explain particle behavior at the quantum level.
  • #1
4everlonging
15
0
what did Einstein,Podolski and Rosen say about quantum physics as a description of nature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
See for yourself, in their paper:

http://www.drchinese.com/David/EPR.pdf

The abstract suffices to answer your question, although you might want to read the rest of the paper while you're at it.
 
  • #3
okay, so then would it be talking about non-locality?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Are you going to tell us what part you don't understand?
 
  • #5
i understand now, after looking at it again, i am just wondering if it is non-locality?
 

Related to Is Quantum Physics Non-Locality According to Einstein, Podolski, and Rosen?

What is the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) paradox?

The EPR paradox is a thought experiment proposed by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolski, and Nathan Rosen in 1935 to question the completeness and accuracy of quantum mechanics. It involves two entangled particles and the concept of "spooky action at a distance."

What is the significance of the EPR paradox?

The EPR paradox highlights the tension between quantum mechanics and classical physics, and raises questions about the nature of reality and the limitations of our current understanding of the universe.

How does the EPR paradox challenge the principles of quantum mechanics?

The EPR paradox challenges the principle of locality, which states that objects can only be influenced by their immediate surroundings. It also challenges the principle of realism, which suggests that objects have definite properties even when they are not being measured.

Has the EPR paradox been resolved?

The EPR paradox has not been definitively resolved, but many scientists have proposed theories and experiments to try and reconcile the paradox with our current understanding of quantum mechanics.

What are some implications of the EPR paradox?

The EPR paradox has led to further research and discoveries in quantum entanglement, quantum teleportation, and quantum cryptography. It also highlights the need for a more comprehensive theory that can fully explain the behavior of particles at the quantum level.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
840
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
797
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
439
Back
Top